Powerful? (Lightwave)
16-Nov-94 18:56:03
Sb: Powerful? (Lightwave)
Fm: Daniel J. Maas 73063,1547
To: DAN BUENDIA 75327,1415
My $.02:
I own both 3D Studio for the PC and LightWave 3.5 for the Amiga.
LightWave for the PC is under development, and will be out soon. The main
differences are probably in the type of animation produced. 3D Studio is
perfectly suited for architectural and engineering work (especially with
AutoCad). LightWave is more on the general, free-form side. I prefer
LightWave over 3DS, personally. 3DS is just too… stilted. Everything is
nice and flat, with great precision. LightWave has splines and metaform (The
best modeling tools since chisel and stone). LightWave also has built-in
procedural textures and very good surface options. The new version being
ported to the PC will have modular architecture, like IPAS.
The advantages of 3DS include incredible precision, fast rendering, and
above all, stability. LW is a cutting-edge program, therefore it is a little
"rough around the edges." It hangs occasionally, and is pretty stingy about
memory. 3DS is rock solid. It has never crased on me. Ever. In addition, the
documentation is incredible. LW's current manual is vague and doesn't really
tell you how to use all of the features.
So, the reason 3DS costs 3 times as much is stability, support, and
docs. If you get LW, an absolute requirement is a subscription to
LightwavePRO, a newsletter by animators, for animators. This really helps to
continue where the docs left off.
Hope I could help you. I'd like to know what you decide.
–Dan Maas