LQ-4000 vs PAR
30-Nov-94 08:58:52
Sb: #138526-LQ-4000 vs PAR
Fm: Steven D. Graber 74453,1070
To: MICHAEL CORTESE 71035,743
Hi Mike,
I've been using an LQ-4000 as well as the TQ-3031F (write once Panasonic
lasers) for about 2-1/2 years. they are solid machines. Last week I purchased a
PAR and I can, without ANY doubt say that the PAR blows the LQ-TQ's away.
I've always been a little annoyed at the poor quality of those units,
manifested in a grainy recorded image and unusual color pixelation at the edges
of objects. Also, you need a VTR controller and if you dont have a board with
Y/C or component output… well, what I'm saying is the PAR does (animation
wise) everything the LQ can do and then some. ie: Splitting, joining, and
deleting frames in the middle of an animation. I also like the ability to
render truecolor-truemotion previews to the par at 1/4 or 1/8 scale. Sorta
gives you a semi-instantaneous WYSIWG preview. Great for viewing lighting
changes over time.
Finally, if you like having a 60-70 pound piece of equipment laying around and
a whole bunch of really expensive re-writable disks in your office then by all
means get the LQ! <g>
You can tell I'm sold on the PAR,
Steve – Vivid Animation