#File protocols
18-Feb-86 08:44:49
Sb: #8699-#File protocols
Fm: Chris Bailey 74716,2015
To: Larry Phillips/ICUG 74025,636
Here's a suggestion for a better file transfer protecol. It came to mind after
reading all the messages concerning CHOP confusion. Why not have a protecol
that automatically squeezes a file, sends it through the phone lines, then
unsqueezes it at the receiving end. Better still, send a header that contains
the file name and other info that allows the receiver to specify whether the
file is to be unsqueezed. This would allow the squeezed version to remain on
CIS for example, then when a person downloaded the file the protecol would
detect that the file was already squeezed and would not attempt to squeeze it
again.
In the error detection area, I also have a suggestion. In my days working on
SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems we used a modified CRC
that was 6 bits long for a 4 byte transmission. This CRC was flipped (ie bit
0=bit 5, 1=4, etc) so that the error detection bits were still the last 6 in
the message, but were a mirror image. Apparently (I am no math whiz) this
decreased the odds of an error significantly over a regular CRC.
– Chris
* Reply:
8712