#.PAK files.
Larry (and others)…a couple of points here:
1) PAK does provide a way to see what's "in" a .PAK archive before
unravelling it. You need the PAK utility itself to do this. It's
a whopping 5K long, so it shouldn't put any terrible contraints
on anyone to get it and keep it around. Type PAK PAKNAME.PAK to
see the files inside the archive, with their full names, their
original filesize, and their PAK'd filesize.
So much for that argument.
.
2) Mark Riley is dilligently working on new compression schemes
for an upgrade to PAK. From discussions with him he indicated he
can get PAK to compress down to equal or BETTER what ARC0.23
can deliver. If that's the case, then PAK could easily
become ARC's replacement, since it's faster, smaller,
its archives unPAK themselves, can use full Amiga style filenames,
etc. etc.
.
3) lastly, and perhaps most importantly, Mark is extremely soured
by what he perceives to be rampant piracy amongst Amigans.
The more shareware contributions he receives for PAK, the more
likely he is to finish and distribute an improved version.