CompuServe Messages

#WB2.0

    03-Dec-90 23:06:44
Sb: #4626-#WB2.0
Fm: RON TROY 76064,252
To: Steven Wartofsky 75300,625
They started out real well with the 2000 and 500 with the upgradable designs. No one expected (I hope) that to be open ended, but to at least give a lot of the capbility of the next machine (now known as the 3000). The 2000 will someday have nearly all of that; ECS, the deinterlacer, and ALMOST as much speed capability (given the bus it can't go as fast, of course). And the 500 can do nearly as well. CBM's problem seems to be that they discovered a possible problem with some 3rd party products (not exactly something new even with the 2000), and rather then put up a list for us and for dealers they seem to have changed their mind and 'prohibited' the 1 meg chip ram upgrade. One tends to suspect that the hassle of getting the word out was less an issue then what MIGHT be a deliberate separation/orphaning of the 500 line; this of course being outright speculation, of course. And the added word/suggestion that perhaps 2.0 would arrive later for the 500 then the 2000 added to that idea; perhaps that 'delay', if for real, could be because extra work is needed, or again to cause separation. So far, anyone's guess. I guess part of this is that every time we turn around, CBM seems to have one of those little surprises for us. My favorite lately was when I went to WOA in MYC many moons ago and saw that list of accessories 'coming' for the 3000 (etc), which, if I remember right, included a 'turbo xt' bridgeboard (I assume based on the 10mhz 2088T clone they may have started selling). I keep thinking that as most companies look to 386's and 486's only CBM would go the turbo xt route. I figure that any time they can pull a real boner they will. Not because of lack of good engineers or other good staff, but for reasons totally beyond my comprehension. Ron