B.A.D. bad?
Paul,
De-fragmenting the disk does indeed make access faster. Mostly in
reading long files, but also in scanning directories. As I understand it,
a program like BAD will put the #?.info files at the beginnings of their
various directories, thus making the icons show up right away. I believe
they rearrange the directory structures, too, so that the disk doesn't have
to seek very much to read them. (The directories, that is.) You definately
want the files sequential, but I think that the biggest speedup is supposed
to come from the directory restructure. (I'm by no means an expert on this
subject, so take this for what it's probably worth…)
I don't have any quantitative measurements for you, I'm afraid. My
hard drives are perceptably faster, especially the Rodime. However, since
the Rodime is where all my downloads go, and where T: is, it gets pretty
well fragged right away. BADs most obvious speedup is on floppies. I
would guess a factor of three faster. Again, this is purely subjective.
The only way to measure it would be to make a well-fragged disk, measure
the time for various directory and file reads, then BAD the disk, and
repeat the exact same measurements. (Though I speak of BAD here, I imagine
that any of the commercial optimizers work in much the same way. BAD is the
only one I have any experience with, however, so it's the one I talk
about.)
Methinks I'm starting to babble here. Time for bed…
–dds (dales@teksce.SCE.TEK.COM)
Whappeta-whappeta-Whap!