CompuServe Messages

#3DS stars

    11-Dec-93 16:03:42
Sb: #70926-#3DS stars
Fm: Don Landis 71673,3612
To: MARTIN G FOSTER 70303,456
Martin and J. Murphy: Feature for feature the complete Bandit system and the complete Max system is about the same price. We're looking at $8-$10 thousand when all the hidden extras are added. The quality of the Max was very good to a Mitsubishi 30 inch monitor. The Bandit was aborting animation after about 20 frames. Its frame capture and playback quality was hampered by a 60 cycle hum bar visible on the playback but not on live camera. Needless to say The Bandit was not working properly so the REP said he would be glad to give me an in house demo after the new year. The DPS-PAR was putting out excellent playback of about 2 minutes of different animation pieces and didn't miss a beat. Mixed in was some live video frame grabbed with the TBC4 accessory. Its quality was variable because the demos being shown were all rendered at different parameters. Some were at 512×486, some at 640×480, some at 768×482 and some at 24 FPS film speed. There was one peculiar artifact I saw on a starfield and associated vertical lines on one animation. The faster the movement of the image the more the image lag across the screen. As the image moved slower the image came together. Still frame observation showed very sharp edges, unlike field rendering gives you. I only saw this on one animation piece so I will assume it had to do with how it was rendered rather than the playback method. Most of the other animations were rendered to fields as evidenced by the look of a still frame. I may try to duplicate the effect with frame rendering and no motion blur. The monitor was a 1944Q. The big problem I see with the PAR is its IDE interface as opposed to SCSI II. As such the IDE standard will limit the top end of this device due to a 500 meg limit per partition and the high compression ratios that will be required as compared with the MAX. The MAX uses far less compression ratio and should be capable of a higher quality image. What you have to ask is "what price am I willing to pay for just a bit more quality." Prices quoted to me last week were under 3,000 for a complete 2-board PAR system and $10,000 for the equal feature Max setup based on me converting from my present targa+ & Diaquest system, and what I would have to buy to get up and running. Since 99% of my clients see their stuff on VHS tape and no higher I think it $ foolish to consider the $10,000 Max system. If your clients view the animation on a Sony 1910 monitor and the distribution is Beta SP or better then it would be foolish to spend for the PAR if you plan to output from these devices. Understand that I did not SEE a difference in the Max quality vs. the PAR but then I wasn't comparing apples with apples either. In theory the Max should have the lesser lossy compression than the PAR. I see the PAR as a device that is going to set the standard for true color animation recording for the masses the way the Snap cards and magni Pro's did for 256 color recording and the