CompuServe Messages

#Dongles

    12-Dec-93 23:22:06
Sb: #Dongles
Fm: Conrad Stolze 72110,1263
To: All
I just saw a seemingly innocent thread about Liquid Speed turn into a "Dongle Free-For-All". Not that I am being critical of your comments, but lets get this out where it belongs, ON ITS OWN THREAD. Here are my thoughts … 1) Those of us who also work in the UNIX world (Greg P, I'm looking for you to help me on this one!<G>) live in a world of "Host ID's, ELM License Managers, and Authorization Codes". For those who are not versed, all UNIX boxes have a unique HOST ID number that is assigned to that machine "at birth". This host ID makes each machine unique, and therefore copy protected. When we install AutoCAD on a UNIX box, we call AutoDesk with the host I.D. number and they give us an Auth Code to "Unlock" the software. Now, this software can still be installed on another machine, but the user will have to call AutoDesk for an Auth Code for that machine. If your brave enough, you could pirate the software by saying that "We moved it to a new machine", but you would be taking a serious risk. ELM codes work the same for network copies, with the code being a function of the Machine Name and the IP Address. This brings up a simple question, WHY CAN'T SOMEONE COME UP WITH THIS SIMPLE OF A SOLUTION FOR THE INTEL PLATFORM? 2) Understanding that there are certain hardware limitations posed by the sheer number of Intel boxes shipped, Why can't we come up with a MASTER DONGLE solution? (3rd party guys, are you listening? There is going to be a major HINT in here for you!). I would gladly pay $20.00 to some "master licensing" outfit for a dongle that gave my machine the functional equivalent of a host ID. Then, 3DS3, LS, TOPAS and all the others could use this as their restriction. 3) AutoDesk 3rd party developers, 3DS3 already ships with a hardware lock so why not take advantage of it? I can understand that AutoDesk would be cautious of giving out to much info about how there hardware lock works, but SURELY there is some part of the "code" that developers such as Vibrant could use?!?! Let me summarize, I AM IN FAVOR OF HARDWARE LOCKS! But the current system is headed for a major meltdown. We have a great collection of minds here, let's use them to develop ideas and answers. OK Guys, BEAT ME UP!!!!