Ask a USGS geologist
02-Dec-94 16:25:08
Sb: #156544-Ask a USGS geologist
Fm: Nathan A. Schachtman 75010,61
To: Doug Mitchell 70621,702
Doug:
The usgs has been better than most agencies in making its materials widely
available, including in electronic formats. By comparison, agencies like the
fair-haired EPA, and the scatter-brained OSHA, with their engorged budgets,
have the money for LOTS of print copies of books, pamplets, etc. The feds
could save lots of money, in lots of agencies, if they made documents available
only electronically, and not in print.
It is remarkable how some private concerns have gotten copyright protection
for their "redoing" of public domain govt. materials. The best example of
monopolistic, predatory market behavior is the West Publishing Co. West takes
public domain judicial opinions, written by judges (and their lawclerks), who
are on the public payroll, puts in paragraph headers (which can sometimes be of
help in electronic db searches of all opinions), and then copyrights its own
format and pagination of the Opinions! West has held on to this stranglehold
on the legal profession and the public for a century. The advent of electronic
mail and publishing is a major threat to West because the opinions do not need
to be published in a paginated book form. They can be uploaded to a WWW site
or whatnot, and every decade's worth can be released as a CDROM. As so often
happens, technology renders monopolies worthless, especially because monopolies
become fat and happy, and rarely have the impetus to anticipate market change.
I suppose I am fairly sanguine about the continued availability of usgs
workproduct in an inexpensive form, via new modes of technology.
On the database front, is there any word of Lanny's dbase coming out? Now
that Idaho is back in the ice age? Is there any way for us to plan and execute
a mineral dbase online here? If we defined the fields, I would volunteer for
some discrete species, say zeolites and U-Th minerals, to input.
Nathan