Amiga vs IBM & Mac
16-Feb-91 12:04:23
Sb: #5748-Amiga vs IBM & Mac
Fm: Bill Dwyer 75755,1140
To: Victor Epstein 70004,515
Thought you might like the perspective of another Mac, sometimes IBM user
who now also owns an Amiga. Besides I don't have enough enemies (sure to
change after this). First, I'm happy with my Amiga, which I bought to do
video post production. I initially bought a 2000HD. Thats a 68000 machine
with lots of slots and a hard disk. Within two days I was impatient with
performance compared to my Mac II so I added a 68030 accelerator for
another $2K which gave me very satisfactory improvements. Later I added a
VIdeo Toaster which you can read lots more about in any Amiga or Video
magazine – its a video switcher, special effects generator, 24 bit paint,
3D modeller/renderer for $1.5K.
For video( or multimedia), nothing available for the Mac or the PC comes
close. I figured I could easily spend $10K on Mac add-ons for stuff that
wasn't half as productive.
For other work than video, I cant imagine using an Amiga if you already
have a Mac. The GUI (Graphical User Interface) is very crude, even when
compared to Windows, much less the Mac. I have the impression that "rreal
men" don't use the GUI, prefering CL/I (Command Line Interface). If you
like PC:DOS you'll love CL/I. There is plenty of application software
available, and much of it is very cheap but all that I've seen is
"iconoclastic" – strange and unusual compared to the stuff the whole rest
of the world uses. Some of the reservations I have appear to be ameliorated
by the newest Amiga, the 3000, which has a better GUI and better screen
resolution. Still, however, I would prefer a similarly priced II si unless
I was doing video work.
Bill