Amiga vs IBM & Mac
21-Feb-91 11:14:41
Sb: #6047-Amiga vs IBM & Mac
Fm: Bill Dwyer 75755,1140
To: Mike Schiller 76416,3065
Sure I can go back and forth – unless specified otherwise, which I can't
remember ever doing, printing and comm are always background. While
applications (spreads, WP etc) don't "run" unless in the foreground, it is
routine to have several loaded for instant switching, and more importantly,
on the Mac, interchange of data, images etc.
Seems to me that multitasking in the absence of lots of processor cycles
isn't much of a benefit. While I grant you that you need a Mac II (68020)
at least for background to be comfortable, I also found that my stock Amiga
2000 wasn't quick enough to do one thing to my satisfaction, much less
many.
Bill