#Amiga vs IBM & Mac
26-Feb-91 16:23:22
Sb: #6231-#Amiga vs IBM & Mac
Fm: Syndesis 76004,1763
To: Don Weatherwax 76635,2734
I like your observations! "Using a CLI requires certain ROMs on your
motherboard" is absolutely true. Even using a GUI requires a certain level
of abstraction and experience. I gave one of my old A1000s to my
grandparents. To their virgin eyes, even distinguishing that an icon was
an icon and a window was a window was a difficult task. Using the mouse
was difficult for my grandfather, who expected it to be an absolute device,
instead of one that used relative motions. He'd shove the mouse to the
edge of the mousepad, then lift the mouse into the air, move the mousepad
over a few inches on the table, set the mouse down again, and move the
mouse a little further to the (absolute) right.
There's something to be said for the Mac… its absence of a CLI has
forced developers to really, really use their own products, without
resorting to the magic that CLI people use. The Amiga is still earth-bound
with startup-sequence scripts, magic ASSIGNs that must be entered by hand,
etc. Amiga user interfaces tend to be much more cluttered and less
elegant-appearing than the Mac. This is a nerd machine, no doubt.