CompuServe Messages

3/4" VTR's

    21-Feb-92 16:40:45
Sb: #16371-3/4" VTR's
Fm: Pete Gould 71240,2152
To: Peter Greci 76104,2110
Here's the short story. One-inch can record the entire composite signal by using lots of tape (both in terms of width and speed). The smaller formats can't do that, so they use various ways of shoehorning the signal onto the tape. U-Matic, VHS and SVHS all use the same system: they separate B&W detail information from the color information, convert the color information to a much lower frequency (at a horrible cost in terms of color detailing), remix the signals and record them to tape. Coming back off the tape, the signal is resplit, the color data is converted back up in frequency, it's recombined and sent on its way. The formats differ in terms of how much damage is done to the signal in the process, and since they clobber the signal in different ways, there's some argument as to whether U-Matic or SVHS is better; VHS is the clear loser. Betacam, Beta-SP and MII record the signal differently, by splitting it into luminance and two color-difference signals which are kept separate throughout the recording process. The color is never downconverted in frequency, hence, the atrocious artifacts you see in U-Matic, SVHS and VHS do not occur. These machines are still not quite up to par with one-inch, but generally only an engineer would notice the difference on the screen. Then you get into digital formats — D1, D2 and D3, which record the signal as digital data (so theoretically you can have an infinite number of lossless generations), but by then we're probably beyond a rational price for what you're attempting. Hope this helps. Pete