CompuServe Messages

What I would like to see is for someone who does have the problem with whatever they do with dpaint to compare the disk speed plain and with a 2620. As for cost effective, it still sounds like rll is more cost effective for a 'low cost' drive. For a much larger drive the wren is cost effective in comparison, but we are talking about the drives that most people would drive. RLL appears to give more megs to the buck in this range, at least in a reliable drive. Ron