#LISP
24-Feb-92 07:22:15
Sb: #34298-#LISP
Fm: Brian Boatright [KBJ FL] 76216,3252
To: Tony Tanzillo [LISP TM] 71241,2067
Sorry, Tony, if I ruffled your feathers. My point was that although the
Xlisp interpreter was fine to play around with, I don't think that it will
be useful in creating stand-alone DOS applications, am I right? For this
one would need a compiler. Part of the usefulness *I* found in AutoLisp is
that it has direct links into AutoCAD's variables and entities. Often this
can be mistaken for a usefulness outside of AutoCAD — I know I did, there
was even one time when I wrote a lisp routine to do a sorted list of
drawings from a directory — not thinking that a simple FOR EACH command in
DOS would do the same thing… without having to load AutoCAD to run a Lisp
routine! <sheepish grin>
As to Borland not making a Lisp Compiler — I may have been in error, I
will recheck their four-page spreads in _Computer Language_ and in _AI
Expert_…. They DO make a prolog compiler, and I may have assumed that
there was a Lisp Compiler also. I will henceforth preface my comments as to
the availability with references to advertisements by the companies.
Truce?
Brian