#1.3 ROMS
This message turned up in search, but its forum couldn’t be identified from the original transcript, so it may not be linked into its thread.
Those 'inflamatory' remarks about Amiga did not just come out of the blue.
I have owned one of the things since the first day they hit the streets.
Ever try to do single-character I/O where you need to be able to read both
regular and function keys in any window ? You'll bust a gut doing it.
Instead you are supposed to use those little requester boxes. Try doing a
text processor that way. The OS is so obsessed with menus and requesters
that any hopes of doing command-driven screen-oriented functions are dashed
by the 'why am I wasting my time ?' demon.
Someone from the TDI- modula2 sphere once told me that I had such problems
because Amiga was so sophisticated that I would never need to use such
methods – that menus and requesters had such all-encompassing
wonderfullness that there is never a need to leave thier embrace. … I am
never going to spend another nickel with TDI ! Thier compiler is good but
thier sensibilities are in question.
This is just one tiny little item given the totallity of the machine – but
it is important. You are right when you say the quality of the software is
increasing – nowdays they actually check for RAM before they write to it,
which is a major improvement. But the non-video software is just 'cheap'
feeling.
I am going to take my advice and buy IBM. By the time I put enough money
into Amiga to get it to do what I like in IBM, I can get an IBM to do what
I like in Amiga – and have more and better thought-out software.
——-> Adios Amiga ! —————>
— a very dissatiafied user .