CompuServe Messages

#PC Mag

    04-Feb-94 08:14:36
Sb: #38285-#PC Mag
Fm: Michael Ryan 72241,1756
To: Dale Larson 76702,654
No argument there, their stock didn't get up to..what? 125+? for nothing. The fact is that Microsoft is the current king of the hill. IBM w/OS/2 is definitely the closest OS competitor (and OS/2 does enjoy a substantial market presence), but NT was very, very, very late–giving OS/2 a huge window of opportunity (no pun intended <g>) to grab a chunk of the market. It didn't because MS convinced most of its loyal users to sit tight and wait for 1.5/2 years (or more) for NT to actually hit the shelves–THATS marketing power (and a missed opportunity for IBM, with the right marketing, they could've shown the PC market which OS was *really* more powerful & reliable). They're doing it again with Chicago… I'm not defending MS–I personally don't like Windows–thats just how it is. –MR, PC Mag