CompuServe Messages

R3 DXF Prob.

    15-Feb-94 15:26:39
Sb: #83537-R3 DXF Prob.
Fm: Jack Death 73361,2350
To: Pavel Korensky 100271,2123
>Will there be a IPAS Developer's Kit for "real compilers" that have DOS >extenders etc.? (like Symnatec etc) Note the quote(s)… ^ ^ —Ehm ? But IPAS Development Kit is for REAL COMPILERS. As far as I know, IPAS SDK is for Watcom C (version 9+) and —MetaWare C (1.7x and 3.x). Both of them definitely ARE REAL COMPILERS (or better to say compilers for REAL —PROGRAMMERS). Not like these toys called Borland, Microsoft and Symantec <g>. If you want to develop IPASes, buy the —MetaWare C. You will need to buy Phar Lap DOS Extender too. /\ /\ /\ /\ ups, there's that bad word again … 😉 || || || || BTW, REAL PROGRAMMERS program in assembler… 😉 —BTW, the MetaWare is a very funny thing. The most cryptic compiler I ever seen. This is the compiler for real mens. Real men don't eat quiche, remember? 😉 —Bye PavelK —P.S. I was not serious about Symantec. I have this compiler too. Very long (approx. 90 MB on my HD), very nice (all those —icons, windows, colors etc.) and very good for click/drag/drop programming. I'm sure that in Symantec version 15 (4.7 GB —on HD) or Borland ver. 23.02 (3.2 GB on HD) the only thing necessary for programming will be the strong fingers on the —mouse, not the brain. <G><G><G> right… (Looks like you haven't figured out the DOS part of the compiler, scratch the windows trash and the 90 megs will shrink to nothing) All BS aside, the problem isn't with the C-compiler, but with the lousy implementation of a licensed DOS extender, hmmm, might that be Phar Lap? The thing is even too stupid to quit swapping to disk when RAM IS available again, quite an achievement. <g> The target of my exclamation wasn't really the compiler, but the tool. That might not have come out as it should have in the original post, but then, the post was talking about it, so I figured that it was obvious. The Watcom is actually an excellent compiler; I only rememberthe MetaWare C from my good old 68000 days, and it was an ok compiler then. Borland IMO sucks royal and I agree with you. (But then I'm only into C ( Unix based) since 1977, so I might be a little too green for a high level discussion like this and leave it to the experts …)