Aztec C vrs 1.3!
08-Jan-89 14:28:43
Sb: #29446-Aztec C vrs 1.3!
Fm: John Draper 76703,4322
To: David Hamkins 76515,1650
Dave,
Sorry about the name. Either there is another 'Hankins' with first name Dan,
or I have somehow had it wrong all along.
Yes, I've played with Gimpel's lint, and yes, I know you can selectively turn
off error messages. The problem I see with that approach is that many of the
messages might indeed point to a real problem at some time, and turning them
off would seem to be inviting trouble.
For me, assembler has two more distinct advantages. The first is that I am
far more comfortable with it than I am with C, and the second is that I can
code faster in assembler than in C, the latter likely being a direct result of
the former. Portability matters not one bit to me, because as soon as I use any
machine specific code, portability is out the window anyway, and I seldom write
anything that does not have at least some machine specific code (otherwise, why
bother? I may as well write for the lowest common denominator).
I am also comfortable with high level languages. To me, C is neither low nor
high level, is ambivalent in its degree of checking, and far too much is 'left
up to the compiler writer'. I haven't even mentioned readability yet. There is
a good reason that human languages use more alphabetic characters than
punctuation, and compiler inventors would do well to remember that.
Ahh… search is finished… there _is_ a Dan hankins who posts to Usenet
from Portal. Sorry for the mixup.
-larry