#Amiga 2000
This message turned up in search, but its forum couldn’t be identified from the original transcript, so it may not be linked into its thread.
I am still puzzled at the huge price discrepancy between the Amiga 500
and the 2000; $1300 if my information is correct. Incidentally the local
Amiga dealer had a non-functional AMiga 500 on display here. I asked why it
wasn't turned on. Evidently the power supply was utterly smashed up inside,
with cold solder joints, according to their technician. I hope that's not a
trend.
I never take talent for granted, myself. "Magic" is another word for saying
the thing in question is mysterious and unquantifiable. It doesn't say
much. I don't necessarily see keeping on the original design team on the
payroll as a liability, even if you're hiring new people. Who's going to
teach the new people?
For that matter, what progress has Commodore really made on the Amiga in
the past 2 years? Was it apathy on the part of the designers, or on the
part of Commodore management? I suppose it's history now. The major design
flaw I see was choosing Metacomco to write system software. Presuming that
Commodore is hiring new creative minds, something I seriously doubt
considering the current accountant mentality in force at the moment, they
would be well off hiring someone who is an expert in operating system
design, including efficient disk operating systems.
A hardware guru or two who can design an efficient, relatively inexpensive
68020 machine with even better graphics would be good. One can get 68020's
for $200 from Jameco, now, quantity one. A 68020 machine can't be all that
expensive to make in quantity if it's designed right.