CompuServe Messages

Byron: /_______________________From your message________________________\\ My question was based on the fact that Jamie told me (over the phone) to "unload QEMM because the PAR didn't like it". __________________________________________________________________ Well, my point is, with all due respect to Jamie, that this is misleading information. The PAR functions fine under QEMM. /_______________________From your message________________________\\ I assume in:sync has a little more knowledge about PAR than the rest of us, and if they tell me I shouldn't be using QEMM, I think I have a right to know why. __________________________________________________________________ in:sync may know more about the PAR but they have given you misleading information with regards to the PAR and its 'liking' QEMM. You have a right to know why using EM386 is suggest and frankly I'd like to know why such a suggestion was made. Razor Pro is a different animal, one I know little about. Perhaps there are specific differences which in:sync could enumerate which will describe the different effects of these memory managers. Bob