#Opinions on Topspeed C
20-Jan-90 11:37:23
Sb: #23685-#Opinions on Topspeed C
Fm: Dean Stanberry 76137,2473
To: John M. Dlugosz 74066,3717
John,
Thanks for your extensive reply. I really appreciate the fact that your
opinions appear to be relatively objective and not steeped in personal bias.
(i.e. Every try to talk to a *insufferable* TC bigot, they're worse than
ex-smokers…) As for not using the integrated environment, well, the text
editor is probably one of my least concerns. If JPI is really smart,
they'll include an option that allows one to plug in their favorite editor
rather than using the "factory" model (ala QC V2). One of the other things
that impressed me was JPI's efforts at constructing an integrated
multi-language environment. I also use Modula-2 and mixed-language support,
while possible, has not exactly been straight forward. If I understand the
literature correctly, VID is supposed to be able to detect error across
languages and point you to the correct source file (i.e. a program
consisting of C & Modula-2 components) assuming it was generated by one of
their compilers. Now there's a minor leap in debugging technology for ya!
(Perhaps this really isn't new stuff, but its new to me…)
I also caught your message over on CLMFOR about the ANSI C standard being
finalized (HORAY!). This should make TS an early leader if their claims of
100% compatibilty with the latest draft are true. Now the race will be on
for all compiler mfg's to produce real "ANSI compliant" products. In any
event, I'm glad the standard has finally been established. At least now we
have something to compare products against (besides ol' K&R). Now we'll
just have to thrash around with all the "C++" varients, eh?
Regards,
Dean