#AmiBack2.0 vs WB3.1
22-Feb-95 07:25:36
Sb: #186236-#AmiBack2.0 vs WB3.1
Fm: henry teller 73244,2610
To: Joachim Sondermann 100410,2322
Joachim –
Certainly, speed improvements can be a major plus, but I've seen more
compatibility problems. We tried a Toaster 4000 installed in a GVP
68040/33 accelerated A2000. With 2.1 the system ran flawlessly. With 3.1
the Toaster consistently refused to boot.
If the speed improvement was significant, then the pricey upgrade would be
justified, but at the chance that my customer's systems won't work, we
chose to bypass it.
On the issue of authorization, I believe you've hit the nail on the head.
VillageTronic had a board, useless without the 3.1 software support. In
order to sell their board, they had to provide 3.1 also. And since
Commodore wasn't around to okay or deny it, they packaged it and put it on
the market. Certainly, anyone who purchases the Commodore assests, will
consider that product theirs, and therefore the proceeds.
Hank
Videology, Inc. Where you get P.O.M.P. under
all circumstances