#Premier 4.0 & Compresion
26-Feb-95 15:49:40
Sb: #3201-#Premier 4.0 & Compresion
Fm: Jeff Sauer 74441,652
To: Richard L. Robinson 75232,136
Richard:
Perhaps I can start to answer some of your questions…
>>Of course this makes you wonder why they sell boards with hardware
compression on the fly on input, but it does look nice on promo copy on the
outside of the box. <g>.<<
The answer is data rate. Video is a lot of information every frame and there
are, at a full NTSC frame rate, 30 fps. If you try to save 30 uncompressed
frames or pictures a second to a hard disk, you'll need very good through-put.
With a standard system, they're likely to be small pictures or you're likely
not to get all 30 frames. Compression technology reduces the amount of data
the system needs to store. Sure, that may mean quality is likely to go down
depending on the amount and quality of compression, but at least you're more
likely to get all the frames.
MPEG and M-JPEG are not the same. Both are based on the JPEG standard (used
for compressing still photograph) but they're different after that. For NTSC
video, M-JPEG, or Motion-JPEG, is simplistically like storing 30 JPEG frames
each second. MPEG on the other hand stores a JPEG frame every, say, twice a
second (these are called I-frames) and stores only differences in the rest of
the frames (these are a combination of B- & P-frames). In other words, if a
person is walking past a solid white wall, MPEG will store the white wall only
in the I-frames. The rest of the frames will ignore the white wall, where it
is the same, and store just the man walking. That means much lower data rate
because there much less information needed. BUT, you don't have every frame
for editing. Also, MPEG is much more difficult to do in real time (see New
Media Mag, current issue).
>>I spoke to Adobe and they "suggested" boards from Alpha (MegaMotion), Diamond
(VideoStar) and Fast (MovieMaker Pro) and kept mumbling about Miro.<<
All will work. If you're going back out to tape, I'd say the miro card has the
best picture quality. If you're going not going out to tape (ie. multimedia
type app.) you'll do better with another. For multimedia, though NOT for
printing to tape, I'd add the Intel Smart Video Recorder Pro to the list.
That's just a start. For what it's worth…
Jeff Sauer