Modula-2 system
09-Mar-88 18:08:30
Sb: #112676-Modula-2 system
Fm: Winston M. Llamas 75176,2260
To: Richard Bielak 75716,352
I am familiar with the advantages of limiting code and data size to 32k
segments – I don't like it much, though. They could make it a compile time
option or provide a secondary compiler to do so. Megamax had the same limits
on their C compiler for the Macintosh and the Atari ST. I agree with you that
32k is probably large enough for most modules – I do not like the fact that
such a limitation exists (there are times when one needs arrays of larger
than 32k per module). In any case, these are problems that are relatively
minor. How "good" is the resulting code from Benchmark's Modula-2? Is it on
par with version 4.0 of Lattice C or 3.6 of Aztec? In the PC world, none of
the currently available Modula-2 implementations produce code as well as the
better C compilers (I haven't seen Stony Brook Modula-2 or version 3.0 of
Logitech's Modula-2 compiler).
Thanks for the input, though – I've managed to live with the 32k limits on
Megamax for my ST (which has been "corrected" in the latest release).
Winston M. Llamas