CompuServe Messages

Manx or Lattice?

    29-Mar-88 23:54:51
Sb: #116238-Manx or Lattice?
Fm: John Foust 72237,135
To: John Draper 76703,4322
No, the (intermediate) object format that Lattice has always used, was originally defined by Metacompost in prehistory. Lattice made their object format compatible, and 'alink' was just slow. The object format isn't much different than our AmigaDOS executable load format, just different hunks. Also, Lattice has seen it fit to register new object format hunks, to make some of their improvements possible. Since they are the only game in town besides Metacompost (and who cares about them, right?) they don't have the hassles associated with registering your own IFF hunks, for example. Now, the Metacompost disassembler only recognizes the original subset of object/executable hunks, even though some new ones were/are produced by both the Manx linker and Lattice.