#CertDeveloper Betas?
06-Mar-90 23:36:49
Sb: #92998-#CertDeveloper Betas?
Fm: Bill Eastburn 70007,1657
To: Mike Spille/Manx 71545,1466
I don't see "just any old user" sending a letter to CBM and volunteering to
beta test. I'm sure there would be a few in that category, but anyone
taking the time to write the letter would likely be reasonably competent.
Those volunteers could be allowed an interim upgrade or two, and, if they
worked out as testers, could be permitted full tester status subsequently.
In fact, that probably wouldn't be a bad idea for anyone being considered
for testing.
As far as I know, NDAs are pretty standard for use with testers anywhere.
The mere fact that a user/tester didn't pay the fee for the privilege of
signing such an agreement isn't likely to make him any more "leaky" than
someone who did pay the fee.
I like the idea of "user consultant." If only CBM would listen to
suggestions and reports from them, we'd probably all have a better machine.
Bill, K3OZM