#Dup'ing font libraries
25-Jan-90 08:14:07
Sb: #6207-#Dup'ing font libraries
Fm: Thom Hartmann <HiResOp> 76702,765
To: David Vereschagin 75645,1752
Actually, David (at the risk of sounding like a curmudgeon), your comment
about "copyrighting the words but not the novel" is right on the money with
regard to the copyright law, which states that the *expression* of an idea
(the words, in the case of the novel) is covered, but the idea itself
cannot be copyrighted. Just look at any of the genre's of fiction, and
you'll see this in play – all the romances, or detective novels, or SF
novels, that are really just re-writes of old stories in a new way.
In the CO, one of the attorneys made the point that while you could
copyright a picture of, for example, the skyline of Atlanta, you couldn't
copyright the skyline itself. Nor could you prevent another person from
selling an identically framed photo taken standing in the same spot, with
an identical camera and film, on an identical day with identical sky
conditions at the same time of day.