#Digitizers
7 messages in this thread
Could someone please tell me the differences between FutureSound 500 and
Perf PerfectSound 3.0? I'm considering buying one or the other but cannot
find a any info on either of them. Any info would be appreciated..
Rick, Because of product support, compatibility & overall quality I would
choose PerfectSound 3.0. Most all digitizing software supports the PS
Sampler. This is not to say FutureSound 500 is not a good system, I'm just
not familiar with it.
Howard
– via Whap!
Ricky,
I'm not familiar with FutureSound 500. I've had Perfect Sound 3.0 for a
while. I like PS 3.0 because it uses software level control, which
eliminates level adjusting potentiometers – a large source of noise.
The software works well, although the on-screen gadgetry is a bit cryptic.
I use it only occasionally, and always end up referring to the manual for
button descriptions. (I'm a rev or two behind on the software, so it may
have changed some in the meantime.)
Hope this helps, 8)
David
David,
The graphic screen used by the Perfect Sound editor is a standard
med-rez iff file, load it into DPaint & modify those cryptic buttons. I
think the filename is ps.main.
Howard
– via Whap!
Howard,
It's an interesting idea to modify the screen, do you know whether it works
or not? I wonder if, since the buttons are gadgets, whether or not the
tactic would work out.
David
David, I modified the Perfect Sound screen a few months ago, no problems.
Using DPaintIII I cleaned up the buttons & used a small bitmapped font to
spell out the functions (Delete Range etc..).
HW
– via Whap!