CompuServe Thread

bit flics

8 messages in this thread
#77322From: Philip GrossblattMar 20, 1994 11:11 PM
Brad, maybe I misunderstood the question, but if you want 24-bit flics, then get over to the Graphdev forum, and grab Dave's Targa Animator.I'm assuming from your question about Pentiums that you run Imagine on a PC). DTA can write flics in 8, 16, and 24-bits, and includes a viewer to be able to watch the high and true color modes.It also does a trillion other things too. Check it out. Phil.
#77361From: Peter GreciMar 21, 1994 4:07 PM
How many frames per second will those 24 bit FLICS run at in 640*480 Rez? I know my frieds 486-66DX2 at this rez with 256 color FLC's run VERY JERKY and don't imagine that a pentium based machine improves this to the point where 16.8 MILLION color FLC's will run at any DECENT Frame Rate. I could be wrong of course having never used a Pentium based machine but don't think I am, after all we're talking an average of 24-30 MEGS PER SECOND sustained.
#77362From: Stan Kalisher (Impulse)Mar 21, 1994 4:49 PM
To whomever, 24 bit anims suffer from two things, one the lack of a palette, or the fact that the palette has so many colors that it takes time to compute them, the other problem is the hard drive to play them back from must be very quick. As for playing them in RAM, you might be able to do this on a slow processor the problem is that the image would have to be very small, say the size of a postage stamp, a rez of say 80 by 60 pixels might work. Of course the amount of colors that you will get is limited. 24 bit is also not all that important. A standard NTSC or PAL image probably only uses around 2 or 3 million colors. The important factor has to do with the blending and dithering math. Of course this will all go away as soon as we all have speedier cpus and ram and really fast drives., We are almost there, of course the PAR or the DREAM MACHINE are better solutions to the problem. Mike Halvorson
#77425From: Peter GreciMar 22, 1994 3:57 PM
Thanx for the info Mike. For now I'm quite happy with the NTSC results from my DCTV unit. MPEG looks interesting for Compiling anims on the IBM/Clone side of the world.
#77437From: Stan Kalisher (Impulse)Mar 22, 1994 6:43 PM
Pete MPEG, it costs billions to encode, JPEG is real and affordable. Mike
#77508From: Peter GreciMar 23, 1994 4:13 PM
Untrue, a MPEG Capture Card is less than $1500, at least this is what I'm led to believe by a Local dealer here in Brooklyn. Tho I AM VERY interested in the Newtek FLYER.
#77647From: David HofmannMar 25, 1994 2:04 PM
Peter, what is the "flyer"? Is it an animation recoder? I guess there is only a NTSC version. -David
#77493From: David HofmannMar 23, 1994 1:21 PM
>> of course the PAR or the DREAM MACHINE are better solutions to the >> problem. Is the DREAM MACHINE the machine you once mentioned here? With the Alpha CPU and video capabilities? If yes, will there be a PAL version and when? to anyone: has anyone seen/tested the Matrox aniamtion recorder? I only saw a small review in DTVW magazine and it said it was very good quality, even better than the PAR. -David