CompuServe Thread

#WB1.2

2 messages in this thread
#46536From: Todd WeissJan 1, 1987 1:56 AM
Well, I do have the Commodore Docs and I must admit that they are anything from being easy to read! Others, please jump in at this point and let me know what's in Cardinal's docs. I can't believe that they could be better than C-A's, since I've never seen a disassembly of something that more closely relayed the author's intention than the source did. Anyway, enough is enough. I'll jump off this thread now unless someone has some insight on the situation. 'nuff said …
#46552From: Larry Phillips/ICUGJan 1, 1987 3:41 AM
Todd, I have the Cardinal schematics, and have noticed at least one innaccuracy, though others have said things that make me think that I have a slightly earlier version. I have heard others say that there are more innaccuracies. All in all though, they doo look pretty darn close, and are quite large, sort of blueprint size. Great for us middle-aged types whose eyes are not what they used to be. I haven't sent off for the CBM stuff yet (except for an earlier package with expansion docs only), but will do soon. Regards, Larry.