Fluor. Mystery mineral
9 messages in this thread
Here's one for you fluorescent-mineral hounds:
I have a sample of rock from an oil-well core cut in the Jurassic Nordegg
Member of the Fernie Formation in Alberta, Canada.
The main lithology of the Nordegg member is dark brown to black, calcareous,
very organic/petroliferous marine shale. The shale is locally phosphatic
(biogenic phosphate–fish bones, pellets, etc.).
Without trying to open another can of worms vis-a-vis origin of petroleum, I'll
baldly state that the Nordegg is an oil source-rock.
The fluorescent mineral in question occurs in occasional thin (to 1") layers
within the main Nordegg shale. Here are the basic visual properties:
Color: medium greenish grey, slightly translucent in thin flakes
Lustre: dull to slightly waxy
Habit: compact (cryptocrystalline at 30x magnification), extremely fissile
(flaky)
Fluorescence: brilliant yellowish white (3600A: standard UV light for oilfield
use…I don't have a shortwave light, so can't help you there.)
Under the microscope, this mineral has tiny flakes of biotite scattered
throughout. Also, the Nordegg is very radioactive on standard gamma-ray logs.
Some of the "mystery mineral" layers seemed to correlate with spikes of gamma
radiation, but this is inconclusive, due to the relatively low resolution of
the log (approx. +/- 0.5 metre). I don't have access to a geiger-counter, so
can't test the samples directly.
My feeling is that these layers resemble altered volcanic ash beds, which are
relatively common in the Western Canada basin, and are usually bentonitic in
composition. However, I have never run across any that showed such intense
fluorescence (or any fluorescence at all, for that matter…)
Have any of you seen any clay minerals with brilliant yellowish white
fluorescence like this? Any other ideas?
Thanks,
Howard
Howard…
While I have no help with identification I saw your comment about not having
access to a Geiger counter.
I can't resist jumping in to mention I have a geiger counter obtained in a
rockhound's garage sale. I was never able to get it to respond properly
although I bought the 90 volt batteries and replaced the vacuum tubes. I've
decided to part with it if you or anyone wants it. It has a small radioactive
sample that the directions indicate is to be used for callibration.
-Russ
I am interested in your geiger counter offer.
– George
Hi, Howard–
At last, a new fluorescent mystery!
The brightest longwave-UV yellow fluorescences I know of come from scapolite
(meionite, generally) from Ontario/Quebec. Wollastonite and pectolite are also
notable for this.
Hydrocarbon inclusions in minerals often fluoresce a bright yellowish-white, as
do hydrocarbon minerals such as idrialite (which also tends toward the green in
visible-light coloring).
Various phosphate minerals may also do this, at least apatite and pyromorphite.
If there were a green component to the color, I would immediately suspect a
uranyl-doped mineral, and the radiation clue would fit nicely.
Phyllosilicates that might show yellow or white under longwave are:
fluorapophyllite, tuscanite, pyrophyllite, talc, montmorillonite (I have only
white listed, not remarkably bright), halloysite, and sepiolite. I have one
casual indication of a modest white response from kaolinite.
Calcite and aragonite flouresce bright yellow-white if the right amount of lead
is present – any fizz?
Given these limited facts, and my limited knowledge of what can and cannot be
expected from the environmental clues you give, the above surely does not cover
all the possibilities, and doubtless include a lot of red herrings. I could
improve it somewhat with more details about the fluorescence, and what minerals
are most expected from radioactive bentonites (in giving special attention to
montmorillonite, I exhausted my knowledge of bentonite) or ash derivatives in
general.
Are we talking radioactive like granite, or radioactive like high-grade uranium
ore here? An article in The Sciences (not Science) magazine of Jan/Feb 1995
discusses paleontological signal processing, particularly use of a technique
called "convolution" to extract some notion of original deposition rates that
had been obscured by mixing among layers as they formed. Perhaps this would
allow establishing where the radiation originates if one cannot slice up the
cores and/or there has been layer mixing.
Can you describe the brightness and precise color in terms of any "commonplace"
(to fluorescent colors) mineral specimens? If I knew you meant as bright as
Ontario/Quebec wernerite (meionite/scapolite), I would zero in on the very
brightest of the above, for example. Is it more on the green side or the
orange side of yellow? Is it too white to match wernerite? Is there visible
phosphorescence? You would need dark-adapted eyes to be sure of this.
I am surprised you use only longwave UV; shortwave UV causes reactions among
minerals considerably more often than longwave, and comparing the two can be
informative. While shortwave was once too expensive, and remains more
expensive than longwave, the last decade has seen longer-lasting filters
appear, making its cost more manageable.
If you want to send me a sample, I would be happy to comment on what I see with
my lamps; I would be better able to compare it with my own specimens and
knowledge. I am strictly an amateur in these matters, and thus would not know
how to give it any special treatment to preserve its full scientific value.
–Doug
Hi, Doug–
>> Hydrocarbon inclusions in minerals often fluoresce a bright
yellowish-white…<<
I'm beginning to think this might be the right tree to be barking up. I checked
a couple of entries in Deer, Howie and Zussman, and found the following under
"Montmorillonite Group (smectites)": "Various organic molecules can also be
accomodated in inter-layer spaces…"
The fact that the samples came from within a hydrocarbon-rich shale supports
this theory. I was unable to get any kind of solvent cut from the sample, so if
inter-layer hydrocarbons are indeed the cause of the fluorescence, they must be
pretty well bound into the structure.
>> Calcite and aragonite flouresce bright yellow-white… – any fizz? <<
Nope, no fizz, even on heating in 10% HCl. The only reaction at all was that
the HCl starting taking on a yellowish tinge in cold HCl after about a minute,
which usually indicates iron. Submicroscopic pyrite could account for the
greenish grey colour of the rock.
>> I have one casual indication of a modest white response from kaolinite. <<
Most of the kaolinite I run into doesn't fluoresce at all, at least not in
long-wave.
>> Are we talking radioactive like granite, or radioactive like high-grade
uranium ore here? <<
Radioactive like granite.
>> Can you describe the brightness and precise color in terms of any
"commonplace" (to fluorescent colors) mineral specimens? <<
Sorry, I don't have any reference material to compare it with, not being a
fluorescent mineral collector myself. The colour of the yellow is more green
than orange.
>> I am surprised you use only longwave UV… <<
Longwave UV is the standard for oil-industry use in describing the fluorescence
colour of oil staining and solvent cuts (the API gravity of various oils is
estimated using fluorescence). This is the only application I have for
fluoroscopy, so my longwave "UV box" is all I have.
Since reading your response, I did a few more experiments that shed some more
light on the subject (no pun intended 🙂 Heating chips of the material
produces no noticeable hydrocarbon odor, although a slight H2S odor was noted,
which might be accounted for by pyrite. As well, the fluorescence was
noticeably reduced. Holding the chips in an open flame (alcohol) for a few
seconds causes them to turn darker grey (I don't think due to soot), and
fluorescence is lost completely.
It seems to me that these facts may also point to interlayer hydrocarbons in
smectites. The darker colour and loss of fluorescence could be explained by
oxidation of the interlayer molecules to carbon. The main reason I didn't
initially consider that hydrocarbons were responsible was the fact that the
surrounding organic shale, while distinctly oily, gave a good cut but had no to
very dull brown fluorescence. Perhaps the smectites preferentially adsorb
lighter fraction (condensate/gasoline range) hydrocarbons. Or, perhaps being
structurally integrated into the montmorillonite layers somehow enhances the
fluorescence. I also tried adding water to heated chips, to see if their
swelling properties were enhanced, perhaps by driving off some of the
hydrocarbons, thus making room for water: no swelling was observed. (Heating
smectites too much causes them to lose the ability to adsorb water, but I tried
with samples heated to varying degrees, with no apparent difference.) I guess
another test would be to get some dehydrated bentonite and soak it in
gasoline/varsol/oil and see what the results are.
>> If you want to send me a sample..<<
If you still want a sample, you can E-mail me your address, and I'll send some
down to you to check.
Thanks for the discussion.
Howard.
Hi, Howard–
>> Most of the kaolinite I run into doesn't fluoresce at all, at least not in
long-wave.
For typical fluorescences it is very sensitive to locale and impurities.
Calcite may fluoresce more or less any color, and most often does not fluoresce
at all. There may be one particular site that offers fluorescent kaolinite, or
perhaps more likely there was something associated with the "fluorescent"
kaolinite.
>> As well, the fluorescence was noticeably reduced. Holding the chips in an
open flame (alcohol) for a few seconds causes them to turn darker grey (I don't
think due to soot), and fluorescence is lost completely.
While loss of fluorescence may be due to chemical changes in the suspected
hydrocarbons, there are other cases of fluorescence disappearing on heating as
crystal defects are healed or things of that sort. For example, chlorophane
fluorite fluoresces bright blue-green, unless you leave it out in the sun a
short while, which is enough to reduce it to a feeble version of the
blue-violet fluorescence more often found in fluorite.
>> Perhaps the smectites preferentially adsorb lighter fraction
(condensate/gasoline range) hydrocarbons. Or, perhaps being structurally
integrated into the montmorillonite layers somehow enhances the fluorescence.
While I prefer selective adsorption as an explanation (zeolites and clay
minerals are used as catalysts for such reasons), I could live with the other
as well. If the montmorillonite scatters UV around so more surface of
hydrocarbons is illuminated, a fluorescence might be brightened. I wonder how
transparent these minerals are to UV…
I'll be moving too soon to rely on snail-mail and do not know what my future
snail-address will be; if you do not have the case closed in a couple of weeks
I will send my new address.
–Doug
Hi, Doug–
I'm pretty much satisfied with the "hydrocarbon-doped smectite" hypothesis, as
it fits the environment of deposition, and there seem to be no significant
objections (chemically/physically/petrologically). I'll maybe have to read up
some more on smectites and hydrocarbons, just to be sure (or get hold of
somebody who can do some free microprobe/x-ray diffraction work!) Thanks for
the help.
Howard.
Hi Doug,
You know fluorescence is not my strong point but I thought this might be a good
point to pipe up about fluorescent color standardization.
Remember Ron Pellar? His main employement these days is Color Scientist and he
has been asked to assist on the technical color end of making a standard
fluorecent chart. FYI
-Bill
Hi, Bill–
The Fluorescent Mineral Society is working on a fluorescent color standard. Is
this what Ron is involved with? If not, we need to bring certain people
together…
–Doug