CompuServe Thread

Fluor. Mystery mineral

9 messages in this thread
#174237From: Howard AllenMar 15, 1995 10:53 PM
Here's one for you fluorescent-mineral hounds: I have a sample of rock from an oil-well core cut in the Jurassic Nordegg Member of the Fernie Formation in Alberta, Canada. The main lithology of the Nordegg member is dark brown to black, calcareous, very organic/petroliferous marine shale. The shale is locally phosphatic (biogenic phosphate–fish bones, pellets, etc.). Without trying to open another can of worms vis-a-vis origin of petroleum, I'll baldly state that the Nordegg is an oil source-rock. The fluorescent mineral in question occurs in occasional thin (to 1") layers within the main Nordegg shale. Here are the basic visual properties: Color: medium greenish grey, slightly translucent in thin flakes Lustre: dull to slightly waxy Habit: compact (cryptocrystalline at 30x magnification), extremely fissile (flaky) Fluorescence: brilliant yellowish white (3600A: standard UV light for oilfield use…I don't have a shortwave light, so can't help you there.) Under the microscope, this mineral has tiny flakes of biotite scattered throughout. Also, the Nordegg is very radioactive on standard gamma-ray logs. Some of the "mystery mineral" layers seemed to correlate with spikes of gamma radiation, but this is inconclusive, due to the relatively low resolution of the log (approx. +/- 0.5 metre). I don't have access to a geiger-counter, so can't test the samples directly. My feeling is that these layers resemble altered volcanic ash beds, which are relatively common in the Western Canada basin, and are usually bentonitic in composition. However, I have never run across any that showed such intense fluorescence (or any fluorescence at all, for that matter…) Have any of you seen any clay minerals with brilliant yellowish white fluorescence like this? Any other ideas? Thanks, Howard
#174415From: Russ MadsenMar 17, 1995 1:29 AM
Howard… While I have no help with identification I saw your comment about not having access to a Geiger counter. I can't resist jumping in to mention I have a geiger counter obtained in a rockhound's garage sale. I was never able to get it to respond properly although I bought the 90 volt batteries and replaced the vacuum tubes. I've decided to part with it if you or anyone wants it. It has a small radioactive sample that the directions indicate is to be used for callibration. -Russ
#174773From: George Adleman HOMEMar 18, 1995 8:35 PM
I am interested in your geiger counter offer. – George
#174693From: Doug MitchellMar 18, 1995 1:28 PM
Hi, Howard– At last, a new fluorescent mystery! The brightest longwave-UV yellow fluorescences I know of come from scapolite (meionite, generally) from Ontario/Quebec. Wollastonite and pectolite are also notable for this. Hydrocarbon inclusions in minerals often fluoresce a bright yellowish-white, as do hydrocarbon minerals such as idrialite (which also tends toward the green in visible-light coloring). Various phosphate minerals may also do this, at least apatite and pyromorphite. If there were a green component to the color, I would immediately suspect a uranyl-doped mineral, and the radiation clue would fit nicely. Phyllosilicates that might show yellow or white under longwave are: fluorapophyllite, tuscanite, pyrophyllite, talc, montmorillonite (I have only white listed, not remarkably bright), halloysite, and sepiolite. I have one casual indication of a modest white response from kaolinite. Calcite and aragonite flouresce bright yellow-white if the right amount of lead is present – any fizz? Given these limited facts, and my limited knowledge of what can and cannot be expected from the environmental clues you give, the above surely does not cover all the possibilities, and doubtless include a lot of red herrings. I could improve it somewhat with more details about the fluorescence, and what minerals are most expected from radioactive bentonites (in giving special attention to montmorillonite, I exhausted my knowledge of bentonite) or ash derivatives in general. Are we talking radioactive like granite, or radioactive like high-grade uranium ore here? An article in The Sciences (not Science) magazine of Jan/Feb 1995 discusses paleontological signal processing, particularly use of a technique called "convolution" to extract some notion of original deposition rates that had been obscured by mixing among layers as they formed. Perhaps this would allow establishing where the radiation originates if one cannot slice up the cores and/or there has been layer mixing. Can you describe the brightness and precise color in terms of any "commonplace" (to fluorescent colors) mineral specimens? If I knew you meant as bright as Ontario/Quebec wernerite (meionite/scapolite), I would zero in on the very brightest of the above, for example. Is it more on the green side or the orange side of yellow? Is it too white to match wernerite? Is there visible phosphorescence? You would need dark-adapted eyes to be sure of this. I am surprised you use only longwave UV; shortwave UV causes reactions among minerals considerably more often than longwave, and comparing the two can be informative. While shortwave was once too expensive, and remains more expensive than longwave, the last decade has seen longer-lasting filters appear, making its cost more manageable. If you want to send me a sample, I would be happy to comment on what I see with my lamps; I would be better able to compare it with my own specimens and knowledge. I am strictly an amateur in these matters, and thus would not know how to give it any special treatment to preserve its full scientific value. –Doug
#175037From: Howard AllenMar 19, 1995 7:28 PM
Hi, Doug– >> Hydrocarbon inclusions in minerals often fluoresce a bright yellowish-white…<< I'm beginning to think this might be the right tree to be barking up. I checked a couple of entries in Deer, Howie and Zussman, and found the following under "Montmorillonite Group (smectites)": "Various organic molecules can also be accomodated in inter-layer spaces…" The fact that the samples came from within a hydrocarbon-rich shale supports this theory. I was unable to get any kind of solvent cut from the sample, so if inter-layer hydrocarbons are indeed the cause of the fluorescence, they must be pretty well bound into the structure. >> Calcite and aragonite flouresce bright yellow-white… – any fizz? << Nope, no fizz, even on heating in 10% HCl. The only reaction at all was that the HCl starting taking on a yellowish tinge in cold HCl after about a minute, which usually indicates iron. Submicroscopic pyrite could account for the greenish grey colour of the rock. >> I have one casual indication of a modest white response from kaolinite. << Most of the kaolinite I run into doesn't fluoresce at all, at least not in long-wave. >> Are we talking radioactive like granite, or radioactive like high-grade uranium ore here? << Radioactive like granite. >> Can you describe the brightness and precise color in terms of any "commonplace" (to fluorescent colors) mineral specimens? << Sorry, I don't have any reference material to compare it with, not being a fluorescent mineral collector myself. The colour of the yellow is more green than orange. >> I am surprised you use only longwave UV… << Longwave UV is the standard for oil-industry use in describing the fluorescence colour of oil staining and solvent cuts (the API gravity of various oils is estimated using fluorescence). This is the only application I have for fluoroscopy, so my longwave "UV box" is all I have. Since reading your response, I did a few more experiments that shed some more light on the subject (no pun intended 🙂 Heating chips of the material produces no noticeable hydrocarbon odor, although a slight H2S odor was noted, which might be accounted for by pyrite. As well, the fluorescence was noticeably reduced. Holding the chips in an open flame (alcohol) for a few seconds causes them to turn darker grey (I don't think due to soot), and fluorescence is lost completely. It seems to me that these facts may also point to interlayer hydrocarbons in smectites. The darker colour and loss of fluorescence could be explained by oxidation of the interlayer molecules to carbon. The main reason I didn't initially consider that hydrocarbons were responsible was the fact that the surrounding organic shale, while distinctly oily, gave a good cut but had no to very dull brown fluorescence. Perhaps the smectites preferentially adsorb lighter fraction (condensate/gasoline range) hydrocarbons. Or, perhaps being structurally integrated into the montmorillonite layers somehow enhances the fluorescence. I also tried adding water to heated chips, to see if their swelling properties were enhanced, perhaps by driving off some of the hydrocarbons, thus making room for water: no swelling was observed. (Heating smectites too much causes them to lose the ability to adsorb water, but I tried with samples heated to varying degrees, with no apparent difference.) I guess another test would be to get some dehydrated bentonite and soak it in gasoline/varsol/oil and see what the results are. >> If you want to send me a sample..<< If you still want a sample, you can E-mail me your address, and I'll send some down to you to check. Thanks for the discussion. Howard.
#175317From: Doug MitchellMar 20, 1995 10:56 PM
Hi, Howard– >> Most of the kaolinite I run into doesn't fluoresce at all, at least not in long-wave. For typical fluorescences it is very sensitive to locale and impurities. Calcite may fluoresce more or less any color, and most often does not fluoresce at all. There may be one particular site that offers fluorescent kaolinite, or perhaps more likely there was something associated with the "fluorescent" kaolinite. >> As well, the fluorescence was noticeably reduced. Holding the chips in an open flame (alcohol) for a few seconds causes them to turn darker grey (I don't think due to soot), and fluorescence is lost completely. While loss of fluorescence may be due to chemical changes in the suspected hydrocarbons, there are other cases of fluorescence disappearing on heating as crystal defects are healed or things of that sort. For example, chlorophane fluorite fluoresces bright blue-green, unless you leave it out in the sun a short while, which is enough to reduce it to a feeble version of the blue-violet fluorescence more often found in fluorite. >> Perhaps the smectites preferentially adsorb lighter fraction (condensate/gasoline range) hydrocarbons. Or, perhaps being structurally integrated into the montmorillonite layers somehow enhances the fluorescence. While I prefer selective adsorption as an explanation (zeolites and clay minerals are used as catalysts for such reasons), I could live with the other as well. If the montmorillonite scatters UV around so more surface of hydrocarbons is illuminated, a fluorescence might be brightened. I wonder how transparent these minerals are to UV… I'll be moving too soon to rely on snail-mail and do not know what my future snail-address will be; if you do not have the case closed in a couple of weeks I will send my new address. –Doug
#175432From: Howard AllenMar 21, 1995 5:38 PM
Hi, Doug– I'm pretty much satisfied with the "hydrocarbon-doped smectite" hypothesis, as it fits the environment of deposition, and there seem to be no significant objections (chemically/physically/petrologically). I'll maybe have to read up some more on smectites and hydrocarbons, just to be sure (or get hold of somebody who can do some free microprobe/x-ray diffraction work!) Thanks for the help. Howard.
#175282From: William W. BesseMar 20, 1995 8:51 PM
Hi Doug, You know fluorescence is not my strong point but I thought this might be a good point to pipe up about fluorescent color standardization. Remember Ron Pellar? His main employement these days is Color Scientist and he has been asked to assist on the technical color end of making a standard fluorecent chart. FYI -Bill
#175864From: Doug MitchellMar 23, 1995 9:08 PM
Hi, Bill– The Fluorescent Mineral Society is working on a fluorescent color standard. Is this what Ron is involved with? If not, we need to bring certain people together… –Doug