CompuServe Thread

#Novell DOS 7

7 messages in this thread
#189338From: Kelly JordanMar 17, 1995 5:56 AM
Has anybody been able to run Novell Dos 7 on the bridgeboard? Has anybody found any compatibility problems with Novell Dos 7? Can Novell Dos 7 print to an ethernet printer? Am getting a Pentium 90 in a couple of weeks and want to tie it together with the 386 BridgeBoard. Also want to put an HP JetDirect ethernet interface on my HP LJ4 and let these two computers print to it via this means (Parallel port of printer stays hooked up the my Amiga 2500!). (Still trying to figure out the Novell areas on CIS) Comments?? 73, Kelly
#189373From: Lothar BartschMar 17, 1995 2:01 PM
Kelly, Novell Dos 7 works fine on my A2386sx (in fact, it is A2486SRx2 since i upgraded it). Only you should use the Commodore keybord command instead of the Novell keyboard command. bye, Lothar Lothar Bartsch eMail: switch@doom.gun.de
#189473From: Kelly JordanMar 18, 1995 8:45 AM
Lothar, Thanks for the reply. Right now I am still learning what I can about Novell Dos 7 and Personal Netware. All I know for sure is if I only use WfWG 3.11, I will not be able to access the printer from DOS (MS). Keyboard command?? Don't run it on my system. 73, Kelly
#189584From: Christian BusseMar 19, 1995 1:52 PM
Lothar, what is an A2486SRx2??? // Christian "ELP" Busse \X/ near Frankfurt, Germany
#189677From: Lothar BartschMar 20, 1995 4:18 PM
Christian, it is a A2386sx with a Cyrix 486SRx2 upgrade processor. bye, Lothar Bartsch eMail: switch@doom.gun.de
#189854From: Gayle Lee FairlessMar 22, 1995 12:31 AM
Kelly, I am also running Novell DOS 7 on a Commodore 386 bridgeboard. GO NDSG will get you to the Novell Desktop Systems Group forum on CompuServe. Norton Utilities version 8 for DOS/Windows works fine. The DPMS system needs more work. OzCIS 2.0c(5) works fine. Anything else? Sincerely, 21-Mar-95 at 8:56p (Mr.) Gayle Lee Fairless Perfessor Fearless from the Rocket City!
#189968From: Kelly JordanMar 23, 1995 5:40 AM
I am keeping a close eye on the NDeskTop forum as we speak, err, type. Thanks for the feedback. 73, Kelly