CompuServe Thread

#Premiere capture probs

11 messages in this thread
#3894From: Thomas H. GiebinkMar 20, 1995 12:06 PM
Anyone here got any experience with this?? I use "DQ timecoder" for machine control and they say the problem is in Premiere. To wit: I do not get machine control when I do audio only captures from within the Movie Capture menu. Do you know why? Bug? I have used Premiere on the MAC and I'm pretty sure I remeber being able to do audio only captures with machine control. On another issue, these are messages I left other forums. I thought I'd inqurie here too in case you can suggest a solution: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello anyone, I'm trying to get my system operating at full capacity and am searching for answers. I use Miro's DC1tv and PCM1 (sound card). 1) I'm searching for an answer to a maximum FIXED RATE (which seems the best indicator the system's true performance) of digitization of 90% JEPG without frame dropout. Of course I can use "adjustable" and get no drop frames during writes… but I think my system should handle top quality. 2) Also, on playback I consistently get substantial frame drops even when I drop no frames during digitization. Why? 3) What does "data rate" (under Premiere's Video Format menu item) do relative to "adjustable JEPG". If I set JEPG to adjustable, "data rate" allows an entry… if I set that large, i.e. 800kB, I get frames dropping. "start JEPG" seems to make no difference. ***************************************** These are messages with Fujitsu tech support: From Fujitsu tech: >>The data transfer rate of 450K/sec was reported by Miro's HDspeed program, do you have any other test results to confirm this transfer rate? The Fujitsu M2694ESA has an internal transfer rate of between 3 to 5 MB/sec. All things considered you should expect minimum transfer rates between 1 to 2 MB/sec. The primary causes for decreased access rates are due to device drivers, drive caches on the system or controller and transmission interference on the bus. First recommendation is to verify with another test to qualify the rates you are getting.<< ***************************** My reply: The solution was with Adaptec's UPGRADE.EXE (on their forum…) which allowed me full 32 bit disk and file access under Windows. It also allowed me to ennable the WRITE CACHE on the Fujitsu drive. Someone should let Royal Computers (who uses this drive in their "Data Screamer" series ) know that they are sending out computers that use your drive at about 1/8th capacity/speed… they come configured with the Adaptec 2940W in its none upgraded state (even though this upgrade was out well before the date I bought my "Data (sorta)Screamer". Anyway enough complaints about Royal. I now get "writes" of 4mg/sec+/- and reads of 5mg/sec+/- depending on how large a cache I set under "Control Panel/Virtual" within Windows. Now the sticky part. That should be more than enough data thru to handle the sustained read and writes of digitizing and playing back video/audio. Miro techs (who make the digitization boards) say 450kB/sec is easily adequate and thier own disk speed evaluator (HDSPEED) rates the drive at the speeds I mentioned above. Yet, I drop 10-20% of the frames when I work with 95-100% JEPG, 30 frames/sec, 320×240. In theory I should have all I need to get top quality with no drop frames. The computer is a P90 with a 512 write back cache. I have run "DEFRAG" to make sure the disk is unfragmented before I digitize. I have all other Applications closed and go straight to Premiere to digitize so there are no conflicts. When I digitize straight to RAM there are no frames dropped at all so its not the CPU itself. **Could this be a problem with "thermal recalibration" that I've heard so much about? **Could it be that I have conflicting cache's setup (drive vs. system)? Or a problem with the size fo the cache's I use? **Is there some setting on the drive itself that could be changed or ennabled?? **I use the drive as my system disk as well… could that be a problem? I'd very much appreciate any comments and direction you could give me regarding this as I am looking to purchase a dedicated AV drive and would use another Fujitsu if it can handle full AV requirements. Thank you for your help Tom Giebink
#3903From: John SmallMar 20, 1995 9:22 PM
These are good specific questions that interest me too. I sure hope some guru answers them! I'm considering the Miro too. Would you buy it again or perhaps ///FAST Movie Machine w/M-JPEG option? Thanks. -jts
#3906From: Thomas H. GiebinkMar 21, 1995 12:48 AM
Hi John, I wouldn't buy the DC1tv again, though I think its a fine deal at the price. I want better image quality and with cheaper bigger drives that can handle the data that should be true at a price I can afford soon 9but not now. Word is that Miro is about aout with a DC2 (60 field/sec 640×480) card but so are quite a few others. I'm not that impressed with the chip they use for JEPG… I'm going to wait for the reviews and learn how to use Premiere in the mean time which is simply GREAT :>} all best, tom
#3907From: John SmallMar 21, 1995 1:59 AM
How about Intel's card and Premiere 4.0? Seen good remarks about this in MULTIMEDIA forum. -jts
#4012From: Jan BottorffMar 23, 1995 10:02 AM
There are two different JPEG chipsets from LSILogic. The DC1 (and many similar boards) use the cheap one. It's limited to 320×240 or so with a maximum uncompressed RGB data rate of 8 MB/sec (320x240x30fpsx24-bit=6.9 MB/sec). The expensive LSILogic chipset will do 32 MB/sec uncompressed. This chipset is used in the expensive boards like the the Targa 2000, and Mac VideoVision. These boards are in the $4000-$5000 range, the Miro is $600. – Jan
#3952From: Jeff SauerMar 22, 1995 9:18 AM
Thomas: You've asked a number of questions dealing with differing issues. I'll a little confused as to what you're primary problem is. >> 2) Also, on playback I consistently get substantial frame drops even when I drop no frames during digitization. Why?<< This sounds to me like your playback is on the computer screen. The miro is a unique product in that it is design for playback to NTSC, not the computer screen. Yes, it can play to the VGA, but performance is poor. Their energy has gone into analog output. (It's a card for low-end non-linear editing.) As far as the Fujitsu drive, as long as it is not too old it is should perform well beyond the capabilities of the rest of the system. There are ways to optimize the drive (see upcoming New Media / May95) but you might look to the other parts of the system first. BTW, this T-cal which you've heard so much about has gotten WAY overrated. It was an issue, but it has been dealt with, in different ways, by most all AV drive makers. It does remain, as I have said before, as a Poster Child for the need to optimize a drive for audio/video rather than data use. Jeff Sauer Desktop Video Group
#3966From: Thomas H. GiebinkMar 22, 1995 11:10 AM
Thanks for your comments Jeff, >>>>> 2) Also, on playback I consistently get substantial frame drops even when I drop no frames during digitization. Why?<< This sounds to me like your playback is on the computer screen. The miro is a unique product in that it is design for playback to NTSC, not the computer screen. Yes, it can play to the VGA, but performance is poor. Their energy has gone into analog output. (It's a card for low-end non-linear editing.)<<<<<<<< I have the DC1tv and do look at NTSC ouput on a monitor…but have since have found that if I increase the cache under "control panel" to huge size (8mg) that I can smooth out playback >>>>As far as the Fujitsu drive, as long as it is not too old it is should perform well beyond the capabilities of the rest of the system. There are ways to optimize the drive (see upcoming New Media / May95) but you might look to the other parts of the system first. BTW, this T-cal which you've heard so much about has gotten WAY overrated. It was an issue, but it has been dealt with, in different ways, by most all AV drive makers. It does remain, as I have said before, as a Poster Child for the need to optimize a drive for audio/video rather than data use.<<<< Do you have an address to subscribe to New Media?? Thanks very much, Tom **************************** I include a message sent to MIRO in case you might have any thoughts or advice… Thank you for your comments Rainer (MIRO), >>>probably HDSPEED gives no correct values because of the activated cache options for your harddisk. We experienced it very difficult to get 100% results with actual SCSI controllers because of the poor Windows 3.11 support of most of these devices. The best capture and playback results will be accessed with Enhanced-IDE controllers and the corresponding HDs.<<<< Alot of us Miro users are also SCSI based so I think that a well-laid out plan for optimizing SCSI systems would enhance the loyalty of your customers considerably. Certainly it would me. This may not be a hard drive problem!! When I work with FIXED MJEPG quality (which should be the best indicator of the what the system is capable of, right??) I get the same results wether I digitize to RAM or to Hard Disk. In both cases the maximum quality with no frame drop is 87% (I'm digitizing from Hi-8, a Y/C signal). I have seen MACs do much better. Are Pentiums limited?? Or, is it possible that DMA rate is too small or slow (I do not understand this very well… llet alone how to vary it)?? Does the DC1tv have a memory cache that can be increased?? Is this a limitation of your MJEPG digitizing chip?? !! Is there a way to make sure that the data is passing through the PC itself with no bottlenecks?? !! Some specific questions: >In the place where you set the video format (Premiere / Movie Capture / Recording Options / Video Format /… I select> 320×240; 0 cropping; image format: MJPEG; mjpeg options: automatic quality control, data rate= 450, mjpeg start quality= 95%. The Question: What does data rate mean?? What effect does it have?? There was an article in NEW MEDIA (November) which reviewed all the video cards and rated Miro at the top ( I bought the card based on that). They make recommendationsfor how to tune the capture cards. I would very much appreciate your comments and help in implenting them (The quoates form the article begin with ** ; My questions to you with ?? **ennable 32 bit file, BUT NOT 32 BIT DISK, access** ?? why not 32 bit disk as well, I've tired that and it seems faster with 32 bit disk too?? **Use Smartdrv carefully (/R) or turn it off. Turn off double buffering** ??why turn off double buffering?? **Optimize your SCSI BIOS, set sync negotiation and the highest DMA transfer rate that doesn't crash your computer** ??As I said I'm from the Amiga. I'm completely lost here. Can you tell me how to do this?? **Shadow the ROM BIOS of your grphics display and SCSI adapter to RAM, but watch out for conflicts with your capture card memory exclusion.** ??Again, I'm completely lost here. Can you tell me how to do this?? **Get rid of TSRs that may cause interrupts. Creat a special boot sequence for video work.** ??Again, I'm completely lost here. Can you tell me how to do this?? **Once you've optimized your harware setup for video, run MEMMAKER to load devices into upper memory blocks and free up conventional memory.** ??I know how to do this?? **Use EMM386.exe with nNOEMS, and carfully set memory exclusions required by your video card. X=D000 is often best. Look for conflicts with the SCSI and graphics BIOS, typically C000.** ??I have done this?? **IRQ conflicts are the most common problems in your system. Best IRQs for capture cards: 10,12,15.** ??I have done this?? **In Pentium machines, go into the motherboard BIOS and disable the same memory areas there to prevent plug and play cards from grabbing them. Also, mark the IRQs for your video cards as USED or ISA.** ??I don't have any "plug and play" cards so would prefer not to mess around with the motherboard BIOS?? ??How do I "mark the IRQs as used?? **Don't use the modeswitch feature on advanced graphics cards that let you change resolution without rebooting your Windows. It eats memory.** ??I use an ATI card (PCI) with 2mg ram. I would love to be able to see 30frames/sec on the computer screen. Would the ATI do that with 4mg?? Or do I need a special card from Miro?? **Turn off energy sonservation features in Green PCs.** ??I have a green PC… I need to look at their documentation to see how to disable that?? I plan to upgrade to a 60field/sec 640×480 card as soon as I can get reliable testimony as to the quality of the various cards. I have heard that Miro is coming out with a DC2tv card which will have those characteristics. Is that true? How soon? I've spoken with a few companies here in the U.S. which are coming out with cards in May/June. Those will be best adapted for SCSI. Will your new card be IDE based or SCSI?? To do the work I want to do I need the size and speed of SCSI fast/wide. Micropolis seems the way to go… but I am waiting to see. IDE seems too limited in the long run. The Miro card is well designed but I want & need higher quality video output (By the way, I came to PCs from the Amiga, a much loved machine, on that platform there is VLAB MOTION, also a German Co. The output from that card is superb! at roughly the same cost as Miro's card… it is a full 640×480 60 fields/sec). I would very much like to clear up the quality limitation with my machine. This seems to be an issue for Miro to address… Its hard to think of going to an even more data intensive setup if my PC can't handle this one currently. I also can't believe that my system is so limited… since word from others is that they get much higher qualtiy video out of P90s
#4013From: Jan BottorffMar 23, 1995 10:07 AM
Have you seen the Mac do much better at Motion-JPEG with a $600 card? The popular Mac cards are MUCH more expensive (they have a much higher performance JPEG chip). – Jan
#4044From: Thomas H. GiebinkMar 23, 1995 8:28 PM
yes your right on the difference in cost between DC1 and MAC cards… However, I still wish the Amiga hadn't gone under, since a German company, forgot the name, Developed VLAB MOTION with the lgood LSI chip… audio board, video board, and all software for $1800 and the reports from friends that use it are that the output is beautiful… Wish Adobe ahd adopted the Amiga and included the AMiga in its software development group…. Premiere is great… but this PC architecture is byzantine by comparison to the clarity and ease of the AMiga OS All the best, TOM
#3977From: John SmallMar 22, 1995 6:02 PM
PMJI, but given what you say about the DC1's limitations with VGA output what are there advantages to paying a few hundred dollars more for ///FAST Movie Machine Pro with M-JPEG option? These are the two I'm considering for a low end NLE setup. I also intend to use online editing for cuts only and reseve the NLE output to short clips for special effects initially. I'll gradually add hardware to support full NLE when I'm satisfied with performance and add the necessary computer hardware (PCI bus with E-IDE and large fast AV IDE drive). I'm also going to wait a couple of months to see what the NAB announcements bring our way but I'm still very much interested in your thoughts on these two low cost champions. Thanks. -jts
#4048From: Jeff SauerMar 23, 1995 9:58 PM
John: Waiting for NAB may well be prudent. They'll be announcements at NAB (and Comdex later in April), including from both of those "low cost champions." Jeff