CompuServe Thread

Forum unknown · Utilities/Other Aps

#PD—-

13 messages in this thread
#13374From: Dave LipshutzMar 31, 1986 11:33 PM
Compute magazine informed me that their programs are not public domain. Therefore, games like switchbox cannot be distributed. Has anyone heard anything to the contrary???? A dealer around here has managed to get the EA deluxe video PLAYER, (not the construction set itself). EA said that they plan to make the PLAYER itself public domain. This would allow you view a video without having to buy the construction set. Does anyone know whether the PLAYER has been officially released as PD yet????
#13377From: GeorgeMar 31, 1986 11:36 PM
The player which has been released to dealers is a Demo which is stricktly not to be duplicated. Thet may plan to release the player as PD but as of yet they have not. If it does get released you will need to use ARC to transfer the videos as they contain a separate sound track (IFF musicraft compatible) pictures (IFF) and a script file. It is neet though…
#13377From: GeorgeMar 31, 1986 11:36 PM
The player which has been released to dealers is a Demo which is stricktly not to be duplicated. Thet may plan to release the player as PD but as of yet they have not. If it does get released you will need to use ARC to transfer the videos as they contain a separate sound track (IFF musicraft compatible) pictures (IFF) and a script file. It is neet though…
#13417From: Bela Lubkin/SysopApr 1, 1986 1:54 AM
Yes, programs from any magazine are protected by the copyright laws. Some magazines allow them to be distributed, but Compute! does not. Their loss, I say… – Bela
#13419From: Steve AhlstromApr 1, 1986 1:57 AM
What is the policy of Amazing Computing?
#13423From: Bela Lubkin/SysopApr 1, 1986 2:00 AM
I don't know — I was given the impression that it was more liberal, but will have to check directly with them… – Bela
#13423From: Bela Lubkin/SysopApr 1, 1986 2:00 AM
I don't know — I was given the impression that it was more liberal, but will have to check directly with them… – Bela
#13419From: Steve AhlstromApr 1, 1986 1:57 AM
What is the policy of Amazing Computing?
#13417From: Bela Lubkin/SysopApr 1, 1986 1:54 AM
Yes, programs from any magazine are protected by the copyright laws. Some magazines allow them to be distributed, but Compute! does not. Their loss, I say… – Bela
#13439From: Tom CaseyApr 1, 1986 2:26 AM
A version of the DeluxeVideo player has been released to dealers for demonstration purposes. That version is not meant for public distribution. When DeluxeVideo ships, the player can be distributed in the public domain. I will be uploading the player and some sample videos to CompuServe very soon. I hope everyone enjoys this freebie player. Thanks, Tom Casey (one of the authors)
#13439From: Tom CaseyApr 1, 1986 2:26 AM
A version of the DeluxeVideo player has been released to dealers for demonstration purposes. That version is not meant for public distribution. When DeluxeVideo ships, the player can be distributed in the public domain. I will be uploading the player and some sample videos to CompuServe very soon. I hope everyone enjoys this freebie player. Thanks, Tom Casey (one of the authors)
#13679From: Larry Phillips/ICUGApr 3, 1986 12:36 AM
Dave, COMPUTE! **SAYS** their programs are not public domain. They SAY you must own a copy of the magazine if you have the program in computer readable form, but I wonder if that principle has ever been legally tested. Personally, I think their stand is ridiculous. Think about the implications. I buy the magazine, type the program in, then a year down the road, throw the mag out. Do I go searching through all my disks and erase any programs that wer printed in that issue? Here's an even better one. I buy the magazine featuring Speedscript, buy the disk with Speedscript on it, and then because I want to update, buy the book with the source code in it (Like the way they milk a program for all it's worth to sell mags and books?). Now, suppose I redo a routine, then another, add a few features, remove a few. When does it stop being Speedscript and become LarryWord? Do I have to keep the book if I want to keep using my version? Do I have to keep the original magazine? Th{_e magazines with the updates? I'd love to see them take it to court. They may win, but the adverse publicity would probably not be worth it. Regards, LArry.
#13679From: Larry Phillips/ICUGApr 3, 1986 12:36 AM
Dave, COMPUTE! **SAYS** their programs are not public domain. They SAY you must own a copy of the magazine if you have the program in computer readable form, but I wonder if that principle has ever been legally tested. Personally, I think their stand is ridiculous. Think about the implications. I buy the magazine, type the program in, then a year down the road, throw the mag out. Do I go searching through all my disks and erase any programs that wer printed in that issue? Here's an even better one. I buy the magazine featuring Speedscript, buy the disk with Speedscript on it, and then because I want to update, buy the book with the source code in it (Like the way they milk a program for all it's worth to sell mags and books?). Now, suppose I redo a routine, then another, add a few features, remove a few. When does it stop being Speedscript and become LarryWord? Do I have to keep the book if I want to keep using my version? Do I have to keep the original magazine? Th{_e magazines with the updates? I'd love to see them take it to court. They may win, but the adverse publicity would probably not be worth it. Regards, LArry.