CompuServe Thread

Nth Engine vs Sigma 400

4 messages in this thread
#22018From: STEVE BOHLApr 19, 1988 7:24 PM
Lansing, . .We are still contemplating upgrading from our existing Sigma 400 card and RGB monitor. We are leaning toward the Nth Engine and Nec Multisync. How does the resolution of the this combination compare to the Sigma? . .Thanks for your help, .Steve
#22027From: Lansing PughApr 19, 1988 10:39 PM
Steve, .. The resolution of the Nth is 640×480 on the Multisync. .. I think you would find the image substantially crisper and easier to work with than the Sigma. You will wonder how you put up with the Sigma for so long. .. Good luck in your decision-making. .. .. Lansing Pugh Authorized AutoCAD and Nth Engine Dealer Austin, Texas (512) 441-4666 ..
#22118From: Don StrimbuApr 22, 1988 11:44 AM
Lansing – what about the Nth B752? 752 x 560 resolution on the Multisync, and a higher DPI ratio than a B1024 on a 19"….. and we all KNOW that Dots Per Inch are the ticket – not screen size. …. All for a puny $500 more….. -don strimbu, Authorized Nth Dealer … Sigma 400??????? PHEW! (No offense to them, Lansing….. I just can't believe how LOUSY the Sigma 400 is, compared to today's graphics systems…..) .. UPGRADE THAT SIGMA NOW! Save your eyesight! .. -ds 😎 .
#22139From: Lansing PughApr 22, 1988 5:00 PM
Thanks for your suggestions, Don. That certainly is a better value. .. Lansing.