CompuServe Thread

#FireCracker VS 340×0

3 messages in this thread
#37679From: Jim WilliamsApr 2, 1992 11:17 PM
I just got my first _real_ look at a Firecracker in action. (actually saw it put head-to-head with a DMI Resolver). I'm quite impressed, I like it a lot… So tell me why I don't need a board with a 340×0 chipset in it (for 3-d stuff, especially :). The thing making me lean toward such a board (not the Resolver.. one I can get for less) is that it's less than the FC, _and_ it has a 34010 in it. <sigh>
#37755From: Douglas FleischmanApr 4, 1992 11:19 AM
I am not with Impulse, but I do have a FC, and it can do as many colors as there are pixels on screen. The Resolver and CBM's own 34010 card can only do 256 colors at a time. It would be great to see Impulse build a new FC with a 34020 chip and a socket for the 34082 fpu. It could still have 16 million colors. The pice on such a beast might be a bit scary….. 🙂
#37770From: Jim WilliamsApr 4, 1992 4:47 PM
Hehehe! That WOULD solve my dilemma. Hmm… Hey, Impulse.. you listening? 🙂