CompuServe Thread

#Forensic Animation

13 messages in this thread
#162449From: rick lapidusApr 3, 1995 8:54 AM
Well, kiss a fair trial for OJ Goodbye. I saw the animation Failure Analysis did for C/Net last night. It was really a nice piece of work. Well crafted & slick. It does however show the danger of what is possible with this new media. Animation has the facility to put a moving image in the mind of the viewer which will stick like a magnet. It may help them to remember key facts or understand complex ideas. In building a "Forensic Animation" from the available evidence, you guys need to be careful about what you add or even fail to show. There is one fact which I must question – a key fact – that the assailant was black. I don't remember hearing of an eyewitness to that factoid. But there it was on the screen, a single black man killed two white people. One of them a beautiful white woman. That's a tough picture to get out of your mind. It's lucky for OJ that this animation wasn't out before jury selection. Rick Lapidus
#162736From: Rick MillerApr 4, 1995 10:15 AM
rick, >>There is one fact which I must question – a key fact – that the assailant was black. I don't remember hearing of an eyewitness to that factoid. But there it was on the screen, a single black man killed two white people.<< Thats would be a tough position to be in as an animator, but I would have to assume its the attorneys that wanted it that way. No matter how it comes about though, it will tend to leave a bad image of our industry if its not truely a fact. It seems that the whole case has been filled with game playing on both sides. Regards………Rick – Technical Animations
#162756From: TBrunoApr 4, 1995 11:23 AM
PMJI but since I work 3 blocks away from the Bundy site…. I think both sides have agreed that the stocking cap was droped by the murderer. The stocking cap is documented as have 'x' number of afro-american hairs. Hence a afro-american animation. Todd
#163143From: rick lapidusApr 5, 1995 8:50 PM
TBruno, Sounds circumstantial to me. But then again, I'm not an attorney. Rick
#163240From: Rick MillerApr 6, 1995 8:31 AM
TBruno, Maybe you meant the message you sent to me for the other Rick(rick lapidus). I was not trying to say what was fact, only that the animator probably didn't make the decision to show the person as black. Regards………….Rick – Technical Animations
#163394From: TBrunoApr 6, 1995 10:15 PM
Sorry if I got the 'Ricks' mixed up. your probably right the animator didn't make any decisions. I lucked out on my first forensic. The attorney called and expected a finished product in one week. Knowing he put me in a bind, he described the basic facts, what he wanted to convey, but left it up to me completly to come up with the scenerio to demostrate what he wanted to say. Well, I guess he liked what he got. They presented it to opposing council……..and settled out of court. ahhhh, the power of the medium. Todd
#163568From: Rick MillerApr 7, 1995 5:53 PM
Todd, Those attorneys always like to see how close they can cut it. I never went to sleep for 2 out of 3 days to finish one case. Are we having fun yet? <BG>. Did you have to generate your own numbers for the vehicles or did the expert do that, I assume it was a vehicular accident? I don't think you are on the list of forensic animators that I compiled. Would you like be added to the list? If so, please fill in the following info. If you want to dl the file its called "forlst.txt" and its in the "Index & Info" library. Name: Company Name: Address: Phone #: Fax #: Compuserve: Internet: Areas Worked In: Additional Qual.: Business Opened: Regards…………..Rick – Technical Animations
#164050From: TBrunoApr 10, 1995 11:12 PM
<Did you have to generate your own numbers for the vehicles or did the expert do that, I assume it was a vehicular accident?> Actually, no. If will allow me, I'd love to tell the story. It's kind of an interesting. Besides we made money on it. In simplest terms, the case involved a multimillion dollar mansion, on a 'compacted' view lot. The compaction is the point of contention. 6 months after constuction was complete the mansion was 'sinking'. One side argued that the contractor failed to compact the soil sufficently, and was the sole reason for the situation. The other side argued that a water leak had caused the problem. The data I had to work from: 1. Water bills during the leak period….you will love this….6 MONTHS….1,000 GALLONS A DAY! (the house was unoccupied at the time, and landscaping was taken into account in this number) 2. A geologist had taken detailed measurements of the floor inside the building. This documented a 10" drop in one corner. 3. Boring data showing where the water was pooling. 4. Data that the footings were modified on site to deal with site conditions. what showed on the plans as a 3' footing was extended to 7'……with NO weep holes (the wolves are howling) What was requested to be demostrated: 1. Show a couple of cross-sections to document where certain items were located. 2. Nail in coffin #1…show the floor warping 3. Nail in coffin #2…show what 1,000 gallons a day looks like, in everyday values. 4. Nail in coffin #3…show how this water would stand behind the footing. What was produced: 1. easy 2. I digitized in the contours the geologist had and created a contoured surface of the warpage. in 3DS I duplicated this mesh, flatten the surface and mapped the geologist drawing onto the surface. Then I place this surface on the property, pointed out the leak area, then morphed to the warped surface. Made it real easy to figure out that the floor moved in the same area as the leak. 3. We calced the quanity of water involved and discovered that it was equal to about 3 ABOVE GROUND POOLS PER MONTH. for 6 months…. So for impact, I have about 3 minutes of pool after pool after pool flying in, dumping at one spot and lining up on the horizon, like so many 'dead soldiers'. 4. Just to add insult, I had a profile of the footing, pointed out the leak location, and then morphed a 'bag o water' that was constrained to stay behind footing, saturating the whole area. As I mentioned before…they settled out of court after seeing this. Sorry if I ran on here, it's just that this is fun stuff, and I work in a vacuum. Todd Name: Todd Bruno or Paul Cook P.L.S. Company Name: C.W. Cook Co. Address: 11835 Olympic Blvd #375 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Phone #: 310.312.8222 Fax #: 310.312.8049 Compuserve: 76635,1274 Internet: TODDBRUNO@delphi.com Areas Worked In: Land Surveying, Civil Engineering, anything that lands in our laps Business Opened: 1911. Yes 1911. We are coming up on 85 years. 3rd generation owned. We have been doing expert witness work for years in the above fields, most of the time creating our own exhibits. Explaining the collection methods and interpeting the results of ours and others work. For years we have worked with just 'plan and profile' displays of existing/proposed conditions, but found that perspective displays were easier for juries. The next step was to convey the dynamics of the events, hence animation.
#164161From: Rick MillerApr 11, 1995 1:21 PM
Todd, Wow, thats great stuff!!! Sound like you are having fun. You didn't run on at all, it was all very interesting and motivating to here your success story. Be sure to tell me/forum when you have something interesting, good or bad. I will upload the new forensic list with your name when the forensic threads settle down or by the end of April. Hopefully I will get some more names to include with all the activity on forensics. Regards………..Rick – Technical Animations
#163141From: rick lapidusApr 5, 1995 8:47 PM
Rick, >>>> but I would have to assume its the attorneys that wanted it that way >>>>> As I understand it, the animation was commissioned by a tv program not the attorneys. Btw, what attorneys would allow evidence to be seen on tv before admitted as expert testimony? I guess you have to do what you can for publicity. That's assuming that was the point of the animation. Rick Lapidus
#163238From: Rick MillerApr 6, 1995 8:31 AM
rick, >>As I understand it, the animation was commissioned by a tv program not the attorneys. Btw, what attorneys would allow evidence to be seen on tv before admitted as expert testimony?<< I have not watched it close enough to know for sure what testimony had been given, I just made an assumption it was for the attorneys. You are right though, you should not see it on TV first. Regards……..Rick – Technical Animations
#164811From: John N. JordanApr 14, 1995 6:09 PM
PMJI- Rick, and others- Regarding the Afro-American/Black character in C/Net's animation, they went into detail on how it was done last sat. Pretty interesting. They justified the color of skin because of the hair type found in the abandoned cap. (as mentioned before) Just thought I'd affirm that that's their official reasoning, not just a pondering. I think they wanted (besides getting attention) to do a really high quality, high realism forensic animation. They touted it as the best, and a (hopefully) model for others to come. Motion capture by BioVision, rendered on SGI's, etc. A metric camera was even used to get accurate dimensions of the building. All pretty interesting. Too bad it's just another going on about a guy who killed 2 people. I think it's pathetic, and a sad reflection of our culture's interests. OJ shouldn't get any more attention than anybody else. Is it me, or is America really bored? JNJ
#165127From: Rick MillerApr 17, 1995 8:59 AM
Thanks for giving us the facts for why they did the animation the way they did. I agree with you, if those people that have so much time to watch someone elses troubles could just read a book, spend time with their family or help someone… what a better place this world would be.