ST:Voyager (non-Imagine)
6 messages in this thread
>> BTW, anyone find the new startrek boring dumb and somewhat femministic-ish?
Gene Rodenbury (sp?) is probably rolling over in his grave. <<
We've only seen a half-season of Voyager yet. Remember what the first year of
ST:TNG, DS9, and (ugh) the first year of Babylon 5 were like!
I like Janeway. She's so different from Kirk, Picard and Sisko — showing
caring, vulnerability — qualities I never expected to see displayed so openly
by a Federation captain. Different strokes for different folks?
Blaq!
>> We've only seen a half-season of Voyager yet. Remember what the first year
of ST:TNG, DS9, and (ugh) the first year of Babylon 5 were like! <<
I liked ST:TNG right away. DS9 took me a while, but there are still a few I
don't like. B5 I didn't like at first, but I liked the graphics. Eventually the
show caught up to the graphics. I really haven't seen a Voyager that I liked
yet and have a lot of trouble sitting through it. It just seems to me they are
trying to live off the old stuff. It's all been done before. Better even. Then
again that's just my opinion.
I especially don't like the ship. Looks like a model.
-Sam J. Bowling
> I like Janeway. She's so different from Kirk, Picard and Sisko — >showing
caring, vulnerability — qualities I never expected to see >displayed so openly
by a Federation captain. Different strokes for >different folks?
Yeah, but a Star Trek show has never force-fed the personalities (such as
they are) and convictions of its characters to the viewers the way that Voyager
does. These characters are not people to me, they're cardboard cutouts of PC
stereotypes (except for Tuvok, who's a cardboard cutout of Spock and the worst
Vulcan I've ever seen – emotionless doesn't mean personality-less). Picard
never jumped down your throat yelling "See how calm and diplomatic I am!" The
purpose of Science Fiction was _never_ be an exact replica of today's society,
rather to provide you with stories and characters that let you examine your
present situations on your own. Voyager treats me like an idiot, and lets me
decide nothing for myself. Does that make sense? <g>
Adam
D&A Software
Good points there, Adam.
I don't think Voyager should even have the Star Trek name. I think the whole
thing should have been laid to rest along with Gene Rodenbury. (sp?) I know if
he was still around this show wouldn't be.
-Sam J. Bowling
>>Sam,
>> I don't think Voyager should even have the Star Trek name. I think the >>
whole thing should have been laid to rest along with Gene Rodenbury. >> (sp?) I
know if he was still around this show wouldn't be.
>>Sam J. Bowling
I agree… I think that most of the Star Treks after ST:TNG, seem nothing more
that space soap-operas… Like why the heck is a federation ship lost… and
where do they get fuel???
–G0w3
I agree
I'm sorry but I love Voyager. Actually, I take that back, I'm not sorry! 🙂
Compared to DS9, Voyager shines like a star. I think the characters are very
well done and compared to ST:TNG's first season, this season was much better.
If either DS9 or Voyager were to take the mantle of the sole TRek show, I'd
pick Voyager.
-Victor