CompuServe Thread

ST:Voyager (non-Imagine)

6 messages in this thread
#11238From: Charles BlaquiereMay 2, 1995 7:12 PM
>> BTW, anyone find the new startrek boring dumb and somewhat femministic-ish? Gene Rodenbury (sp?) is probably rolling over in his grave. << We've only seen a half-season of Voyager yet. Remember what the first year of ST:TNG, DS9, and (ugh) the first year of Babylon 5 were like! I like Janeway. She's so different from Kirk, Picard and Sisko — showing caring, vulnerability — qualities I never expected to see displayed so openly by a Federation captain. Different strokes for different folks? Blaq!
#11323From: Sam J. BowlingMay 3, 1995 10:30 PM
>> We've only seen a half-season of Voyager yet. Remember what the first year of ST:TNG, DS9, and (ugh) the first year of Babylon 5 were like! << I liked ST:TNG right away. DS9 took me a while, but there are still a few I don't like. B5 I didn't like at first, but I liked the graphics. Eventually the show caught up to the graphics. I really haven't seen a Voyager that I liked yet and have a lot of trouble sitting through it. It just seems to me they are trying to live off the old stuff. It's all been done before. Better even. Then again that's just my opinion. I especially don't like the ship. Looks like a model. -Sam J. Bowling
#11364From: Adam HendershotMay 4, 1995 11:10 AM
> I like Janeway. She's so different from Kirk, Picard and Sisko — >showing caring, vulnerability — qualities I never expected to see >displayed so openly by a Federation captain. Different strokes for >different folks? Yeah, but a Star Trek show has never force-fed the personalities (such as they are) and convictions of its characters to the viewers the way that Voyager does. These characters are not people to me, they're cardboard cutouts of PC stereotypes (except for Tuvok, who's a cardboard cutout of Spock and the worst Vulcan I've ever seen – emotionless doesn't mean personality-less). Picard never jumped down your throat yelling "See how calm and diplomatic I am!" The purpose of Science Fiction was _never_ be an exact replica of today's society, rather to provide you with stories and characters that let you examine your present situations on your own. Voyager treats me like an idiot, and lets me decide nothing for myself. Does that make sense? <g> Adam D&A Software
#11405From: Sam J. BowlingMay 4, 1995 10:23 PM
Good points there, Adam. I don't think Voyager should even have the Star Trek name. I think the whole thing should have been laid to rest along with Gene Rodenbury. (sp?) I know if he was still around this show wouldn't be. -Sam J. Bowling
#11636From: Grady WMay 8, 1995 12:38 AM
>>Sam, >> I don't think Voyager should even have the Star Trek name. I think the >> whole thing should have been laid to rest along with Gene Rodenbury. >> (sp?) I know if he was still around this show wouldn't be. >>Sam J. Bowling I agree… I think that most of the Star Treks after ST:TNG, seem nothing more that space soap-operas… Like why the heck is a federation ship lost… and where do they get fuel??? –G0w3 I agree
#12022From: Victor D'AmatoMay 14, 1995 11:57 AM
I'm sorry but I love Voyager. Actually, I take that back, I'm not sorry! 🙂 Compared to DS9, Voyager shines like a star. I think the characters are very well done and compared to ST:TNG's first season, this season was much better. If either DS9 or Voyager were to take the mantle of the sole TRek show, I'd pick Voyager. -Victor