CompuServe Thread

#Missing 2.2

11 messages in this thread
#9382From: Michael StachowskiJun 21, 1989 9:48 AM
Howdy All, Just thought I'd let you know that I also never recieved Issue V2.2 I just recieved 2.3 today so would like to know how to go about getting 2.2. BTW the card in the magazines center mentions microfiche Back Issue prices but says nothing about hard copy prices. Subscription info follows. Michael L Stachowski 8817 Heath Rd. Colden NY 14033
#9400From: Joe VeazeyJun 21, 1989 10:24 PM
I notice that we never get any replies here from Transactor. It's a good magazine, but I am dismayed by the poor service. I too received issue 2.3 today, but never receieved 2.2. My sub # is 9045. What's happening Croftward?
#9407From: Peter SmithemJun 22, 1989 7:06 AM
HEY!! 2.3 FINALLY showed up. Now how about 2.2? Sure would like to read part one of the article in 2.3… Peter_S (LeCroy)
#9422From: Joe VeazeyJun 22, 1989 11:45 PM
I am getting rather fed up with it. I shall be trying to phone and talk to these people, and get some action. Considering how much I spent for a subscription, and disks, I am out about $90US. Too much to spend on something I am not getting.
#9431From: Malcolm O'BrienJun 23, 1989 12:31 AM
Hi Peter: Which (if either) of those names is really yours? No, wait. What name is on your sub label? Send me an Easy, please. Malcolm
#9413From: Betty Clay/SYSOPJun 22, 1989 5:20 PM
Joe, We are working with two separate items here. The support people on CIS are the editorial staff. They are responsible for accepting articles, editing them, and putting the magazine into printable form. They have no control over the things that happen after that. Nick Sullivan, Chris Zamora, Malcolm O'Brien, and Tim Grantham are the editors. Since last fall, an entirely separate group of people are responsible for the physical printing, mailing, etc., of the magazine. This group of people are employees of Croftward Publishing, and it is they who are falling down on the job. What we have done here – and I am also one of the guilty – is to blame the editorial staff for things they cannot possibly control, and it seems a bit pointless for them to continue coming here to answer questions they cannot possibly answer. What we NEED to do is call that 800 number given in the magazine and talk directly to Croftward about our subscription problems. Then, we can ask about other things here on the forum and expect answers, but only if our questions deal with the editorial content of the magazine over which our representatives have some kind of control. I feel sure Nick or Malcolm will correct me if I have made an error in assessing this situation. Betty
#9423From: Joe VeazeyJun 22, 1989 11:47 PM
Absolutly right. I was not aware that I was not talking to someone with a hold over publishing. It is unfortunate that the editorial staff cannot wield more influence over the publishers. (I hope the reverse is not true).I shall be calling the 800 number tomorrow.
#9433From: Malcolm O'BrienJun 23, 1989 12:42 AM
Thanks again, Betty. The 800 number was set up for orders only. I suspect that the lady in TX who answers the phone is entirely unaware of anything but the cost of a subscription. As some kind of a technical point… Tim and I (and our new Asst. Ed., Paul Bosacki) are actually Croftward employees now. What that means is that our cheques look different now and Transactor has to give us separation certificates (Cdn. law >yawn< ). We do the same work, sit in the same chairs, drink the same coffe. But, technically, we're Croftward employees too. I actually received a bunch of CompuServe responses recently from Sandra but many of them were not informative to me. I'll have to explain what info I need to her. Then CIS turn arounds will be much quicker. Malcolm
#9435From: John DraperJun 23, 1989 3:19 AM
Gee Malcolm, isn't that same coffee getting a bit low? Time to refill the reservoir I think. 🙂 -larry
#9430From: Malcolm O'BrienJun 23, 1989 12:29 AM
Hi Joe: People DO get replies from Transactor. When Transactor has information to convey. Of course, when I say "Transactor" I mean me. I'm getting close to my deadline on the 8-bit mag and I took the Amiga back to the office. I'm back to using the 64 to catch up on CompuServe. I've been reading my mail but haven't been in the Fora of late. Busy. I've reduced my reading here to only Section 8. Having found the modem cable I need for the 64, I expect I'll be back to being here more frequently. I hope to have a response to your request soon. Malcolm
#9429From: Malcolm O'BrienJun 23, 1989 12:19 AM
Hi Mike: I'll send you a copy of 2:2 in the morning. Malcolm