CompuServe Thread

License AmigaDOS?

5 messages in this thread
#108318From: John BonoJun 11, 1990 2:41 PM
That depends on how CBM handles the licensing agreement. If commodore licenses the hardware, but does not license the OS then market share for the Amiga would be helped and not at CBM's expense. However, if they license the OS as well, then CBM would lose control over the Amiga technology, and though market share would increase, CBM's share of it would decrease. John
#108356From: SyndesisJun 11, 1990 9:37 PM
At the press conference, someone asked Irving Gould if CBM planned to license the chipset, if this thing really took off. He said yes, but you could see the wheels turning in his head… "If CDTV takes off, sure, I'll sell the chipset to anybody who wants it… who cares, I'll be richer!" 🙂
#108376From: Don Curtis/SYSOPJun 11, 1990 11:30 PM
John, Not necessairly…if Commodore licensed both the chipset and OS, but required that no modifications be done with either..then they'd not lose control. They'd be in the position of having to compete with clones, but one would hope they could effectively compete in such a market. Don
#108413From: Mike SchillerJun 12, 1990 3:57 AM
Don: And if they couldn't, it'd just mean new and better machines for the users, Amiga or AmigaClone! the more AmigaDOS machines out there the better, with or without C= name upon them! -Mike Schiller CIS: 76416,3065
#108456From: Matthew J. W. RatcliffJun 12, 1990 10:51 AM
They mke their own chips, so even a boom in clones would probably let them sell huge numbers of chips before anyone else was able to start