EXPENSIVE 3D
1 messages in this thread
Bruce,
while i agree the amiga has a number of problems (like a terrible low res
mode and the awful GUI under WB1.x), it is actually a fairly decent
machine. Commodore aside <g>.
I am a multi-lingual programmer who got tossed into a CDTV project a year
or two back. I was suprised at some of the nice things the box does. Like
giving you a REAL multitasking OS & ability to write multi-process
applications.
Of course, most of this good stuff is hidden away, such that you need to
spend a LONG time learning the tricks (esp if you play with the copper list
for some fancy graphics effects or learning the blitter, etc). We wound up
hiring an amiga expert (who is kinda weird <g>).
Another neat thing about the Amiga, is its ability to run DOS and MAC
software (with appropriate add-in cards).
I'm impressed with the box, completely disgusted with C=, and still using
my PC and Mac.
like you say, the bottom line for the '90's is to be platform independent
as possible. There are some things only an SGI box will do, and somethings
that an amiga can do just as well, but for a fraction of the cost. Having
the ability to supply & use both (plus PC & Mac tools as appropriate) is a
BIG help. I even found a use for an old Atari ST recently (it converts MAC
fonts to GEM format, which is used by GENUS PCX tools).
Jerry