CompuServe Thread

#3/4" vs. svhs system

9 messages in this thread
#17132From: ROBERTO LACAYOJun 13, 1992 5:36 PM
Hello, We are going to purchase equipment to lay down our animation and to do our editing, currently betacam is cost prohibitive for us. The options we have been looking at 3/4" bvu 950 ntsc or SVHS ag 7750 (panosonic). Up until recently we felt that 3/4" was the way to go. Most individuals have noted the greater latitude in reproduction and this has been the format we have used. Now, reps from company's dealing in frame controllers as well as others whom we know have expressed a feeling that there is no difference in the 2 formats, except cost, and in fact they feel that 3/4'" is slowly but surely going to be pushed aside. Any advise or thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
#17136From: MARTIN G FOSTERJun 13, 1992 7:34 PM
My feeling is go with the industry standard which, at the corporate/cable/professional level, is 3/4" SP. I would suggest only considering svhs if you don't really need to do tapes for clients, rather your stuff is for in-house use. In my experience, I'm almost always asked for output to 3/4" sp, vhs, 1" or betacam but never (so far) svhs or hi-8. I don't even own a vtr since it wouldn't be cost effective – there are so many service bureaus/post production houses around here (SoCal) that tape lay-off prices are low and I can take my whole system and hook up, if necessary (I have a targa+ 16/32 and diaquest dq422). As I said, it's just my opinion/experience but there just seems to be so many more 3/4" setups than s-vhs and the word on the street seems to be that 3/4" will probably be replaced by Betacam SP, eventually, not s-vhs.
#17140From: Yost GroupJun 13, 1992 8:33 PM
SVHS is a decent mastering format as long as you don't "go multiple generations down". It is basically uncopyable without tremendous artifacting problems. 3/4" SP (a la the 950) is much more stable. However, at the price you'll pay for the 950, you could spend another few thousand and get one of the new Sony PVW Betacam units (about $13K). Another huge difference between the 7750 and the 950 (or beta unit) is the transport mechanics. The 3/4" and beta units are much more rugged. – G
#17149From: sherwood egbertJun 14, 1992 1:16 AM
3/4 is better, i have both the 950 and 7750 and you will not find many that will accept 1/2 inch(7750 svhs) over 3/4 SP output. 3/4 is much more standard for one thing. there is nobody that uses the 7750 for broadcast. industrial at most. although the svhs is quite nice. i also use betacam now, and its better than 3/4. to give you a level. 1/2 inch 7750 … ok…. 3/4 twice as good … betacam … twice as good as 3/4…. d2 even better but more complicated. and the price is as the level is…. 7750 ..$4500…3/4(used 16,000).. betacam(36,000) … d2(i don't even want to quote). the new mII(13,000) NOT STANDARD. … sherwood
#17180From: Ken Loss-CutlerJun 15, 1992 12:22 AM
Roberto: 3/4" will continue to be a used format for industrial/corporate work for the foreseeable future BUT it is being phased out of production. The major manufacturers have already discontinued the 3/4" format. 3/4" SP was an attempt to revamp the format but it was short-lived. BetaSP has become the mid-range defacto standard for animation recording, but S-VHS is holding its own. The 7750 lists for around 6K, about half the price of the low-end BetaSP option. For most applications, the S-VHS is quite sufficient, but if you plan on doing work for broadcast clients (and that includes "cheap" car commercials and the like) you will probably be well-advised to bite the bullet and purchase the BetaSP. If corporate, however, is your main goal, go with the S-VHS. I just don't see where 3/4" is a viable option except for motion testing and the like, given the cost/benefit options available with the other formats. All these arguements will become academic in a matter of a few years, anyway, when direct RGB-analog recording to laserdisc or even directly to computer drives becomes more nearly perfected and the price begins to come down. It is, however, a safe bet that you can recoup the cost of your tape deck over the next 2-3 years before that occurs. I feel sorry, though, for the animators who have to make this choice a couple of years from now. It will be a tough one. Good Luck, and let us know how things turn out. Ken Loss-Cutler
#17200From: sherwood egbertJun 15, 1992 2:06 PM
don't leave out the cable industry. they are still using 3/4sp at least around here in la county. they plan to go betacam in about two years. but who knows what will be here in two years. sherwood
#17252From: Ken Loss-CutlerJun 16, 1992 12:09 AM
Sherwood: I think you, too, suspect that betacam will not be "it" in a couple of years. Hey, we're lucky! At least we don't have a few hundred thousand wrapped up in 1" C decks. Ken Loss-Cutler
#17277From: sherwood egbertJun 16, 1992 10:51 AM
true very true…. i was in the hospital the other day with my wife and she was getting some kind of sound scan. i was very impressed with the computer they were using. i asked how much this thing cost he told me about 250k, and said that the last years model they bough t cost 150k and they had to sell it for 9,000 because it was lost technology now. you just don't know from month to month what will be coming out. it a definate risk buying new technology. sherwood
#17365From: Yost GroupJun 17, 1992 10:23 AM
Looks like a very specific example of why health-care costs are so high. – Jack