CompuServe Thread

#Mitsumi vs. Panasonic

4 messages in this thread
#49975From: Robert CauthornJun 6, 1993 2:59 AM
Hi, Another person getting ready to make the plunge into CD-ROM. I'm looking at a number of the lower priced systems. Can't quite afford those double speed wonders… Specifically, I've seen a bit of press on Panasonic drives. While I've bad experiences with Panasonic in other areas of electronics, I have no knowledge of them as a computer supplier. The lower end of the Panasonic line is priced along the lines of the Mitsumi drives. Can anyone out there offer opinions on how these drives compare? Is Mitsumi the drive of choice on the low price end? Also, I don't plan to get a sound card right now because it doesn't interest me. What happens if I run a CD-ROM multimedia title without a sound card. Does it lock up or just keep running in silence? Thanks, Bob
#49978From: Roscoe ThomasJun 6, 1993 4:13 AM
Most MPC titles should still work. I've run video for windows videos with no sound, and titles that wanted MIDI or wave sound with no problem. DOS aps are another matter, I had several which refused to work for anything cause they didn't find the right sound card. I've since added the PAS 16 to my own system, but have run many of the aps on other compters with no card. some aps give me a message, but I click ok, and it goes on and works with no sound
#50014From: Robert CauthornJun 6, 1993 8:37 PM
Thanks for the info. t's more or less what I expected. Seems that the software vendors would be smart to ensure their software would work with any, all or no sound cards. BTW, how do you like the PAS 16? Best, Bob
#50026From: Roscoe ThomasJun 7, 1993 12:32 AM
I like it, it is quieter with less noise than the SB Pro and PAS cards. Even the SCSI I/F works ok, but it does not keep me from using Hitachi bus or Future Domain SCSI cards in the same machine when I use one of the other drives but none of the 3 CD-ROM interfaces uses DMA, so no problem. I use the SCSI I/F for my Hitachi CDR3750 drive, which is good enough to let me do video for windows on my poor 25MHz 386. The cpu time used is only about 25% for 150KB transfer. This made me happy since I didn't have $600+ for a 486 motherboard.