CompuServe Thread

CD-ROM PUBLISHING

4 messages in this thread
#49914From: SanjayJun 5, 1993 4:33 AM
Rick I agree that scanning without OCR is not the optimal use of the technology but it is of prime importance to my employers that each article must appear in exactly the same way as the article that appeared in the original book/journal. That is the reason for their publishing in book form direct from photocopies. And as far as the number of pages is concerned, surely if a CD-ROM can take 100,000 pages of plain text, it will easily take 400 pages of graphic images. Wouldn't it? Software- I have downloaded the file SFTWR.TXT and found it the most complete source on the topic. In fact, Byte magazine of February 1993 mentions 4-5 companies in the retrieval software business and I could find all of them in your file. However your file does not mention INMAGIC- they are on CompuServe GO INMAGIC (Library 15).
#49960From: David EdwardsJun 5, 1993 11:29 PM
FYI, a CD-ROM can hold upwards of 250,000 pages of text… garphics are a bit harder to quantify although I just finished 3 picture archives for a client and they were averaging 7000 graphics per disc. David L. Edwards Shoestring Engineering, Inc.
#50057From: Jerry WarnerJun 7, 1993 1:12 PM
David, I was just reading your response to Sanjay and thought I'd throw another two cents worth in. There is a new compression driver that allows 1.3 GB of data or more onto a CD-R. That should really boost both the text page count and the graphic count. Jerry Warner CD Solutions, Inc.
#50090From: Rich Bowers/OPAJun 7, 1993 9:33 PM
Sanjay: Inmagic will be on the next iteration of our list, and they do have software (as do a couple of others) which would do what you want. >>And as far as the number of pages is concerned, surely if a CD-ROM can take 100,000 pages of plain text, it will easily take 400 pages of graphic images. Wouldn't it?<< My remarks were not questioning the technical possibility of the kind of project you described. Certainly it is do-able. My question related to the wisdom of undertaking such a project from a marketing perspective. Just because it can be done, doesn't mean it should be done. Will it save you lots of money? Have your customers been clamoring to read reproduced pages on a computer screen? What is the rationale for doing this? If a rationale seems difficult to generate, maybe it is appropriate to re-think the product concept. A concept that works well on paper, may not necessarily work so well on CDROM, and vice-versa. All I'm suggsting is that the technology be put to its highest and best use for both the producer and the customer. And if your employer wants to take advantage of new technologies, they might want to re-examine their business strategies. FWIW. – Rich Bowers