CompuServe Thread

#Adaptec/Future Domain?

3 messages in this thread
#50820From: Rick ThoensenJun 18, 1993 10:03 AM
I'll be purchasing a Toshiba 3401B soon, but am waffling on the choice of SCSI adapter. The system has a 486/33 ISA bus motherboard with 8MB, and perhaps 16MB someday. My operating system is OS/2 2.x, which supports both the Adaptec and Future Domain controllers natively. Which company provides better technical support to the *consumer*? Is EZSCSI or PowerSCSI the more compatible and bug-free product? Should I be concerned about ASPI versus CAM, even though PowerSCSI contains a CAM-to-ASPI conversion layer? All thoughts welcomed, Jean
#50918From: Kerry ReuerJun 19, 1993 6:01 PM
Jean, My favorite is the Adaptec as I have had some problem with the FD. I doubt service is a real problem for the controller as my experience is that they are plug and go for the most part. Adaptec is considered an industry standard and is a safe buy but if you need support you will need to get it from your local dealer and not Adaptec. Kerry
#50926From: Bruce De VriesJun 19, 1993 7:27 PM
ASPI is better supported than CAM, so if you need to change hardware there will be less grief. Each layer of drivers causes additional delays and uses additional memory. I'd compare specs assuming you'll need ASPI to access many SCSI devices like scanners and CD-ROM drives. The specs I'd compare are transfer rates and high memory usage on the CPU you plan to use. Adaptec just bought Trantor, so they are likely to have the best driver support.