CompuServe Thread

#4000 crash prone?

25 messages in this thread
#31427From: John GagerJan 16, 1993 7:34 PM
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed their 4000 is more crash prone than any other Amiga they have owned? I realize that the 040 chip and the copyback cache can cause some problems at times, but even if the copyback is disabled, the 4000 is tempermental with a lot of software. Most of the problem is a Guru with a CPU trap of 80000004 (Illegal Instruction), and the second most frequent Guru is 80000003 (Address Error). If I run Enforcer to try and see what might be causing the problems, sometimes I can get enough of the printout before it resets the computer to show that the input.device is usually the one causing the crash. Maybe this is just a coiencidence and something else is causing the problem. But it sure takes a lot of the fun out of the 4000 and at times it makes you want a 030 chip instead. I remember Eric Flom was complaining that his GVP 040 accelerator was having a lot of the same errors, so is it something in the system software causing problems, or is the 040 unfriendly to all the Amiga software? . //
#31429From: John Toebes/SYSOPJan 16, 1993 10:44 PM
What software are you running when you see this problem? Typically input.device giving the errors is the result of someone else stomping on it.
#31433From: John GagerJan 17, 1993 12:50 AM
Well I haven't been able to really pinpoint a particular type of software causing the problems. It's just that the chances of any particular program crashing the 4000 seems to have increased considerably. Anything I do find that is causing problems, then I check it with the cache's off to see if it is still crashes. And if so, I get rid of it. ASDG had a problem with their ES-300C scanner module in that some customers were reporting that the module would not work unless the Copyback mode was turned off, like mine. However others with similar systems had no problems at all. They were never able to reproduce the problem on their 4000, however they and CBM were able to come up with a fix. So with the crashes I've had, and what others have reported, I still have a feeling that the 040 is a little flakey 8^) . //
#31435From: Robert WilcoxJan 17, 1993 10:19 AM
If the 040 is indeed more prone to this behavior and if producing code that won't crash or excite Enforcer on an 040 will guarantee no crashes or enforcer hits with other CPUs, then this may be a good thing in the long run.
#31444From: John GagerJan 17, 1993 6:09 PM
"If the 040 is indeed more prone to this behavior and if producing code that won't crash or excite Enforcer on an 040 will guarantee no crashes or enforcer hits with other CPUs, then this may be a good thing in the long run." Well that's true in a way, but sometimes I don't care to be the beta tester, especially if I have something going in the backround that I haven't saved yet 8^) . //
#31438From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiJan 17, 1993 12:37 PM
John, I had to get rid of a few program when I first got my A4K, but since then I never have to turn off Copyback for anything except games. My A4000 is much more stable than my old A2000/030 combo was. Known problem-causers with the A4000: ARP commands (there's a patch available called Arp040Fix) Stuff packed with old versions of PowerPacker (repack with 4.0a or Turbo Imploder) Poorly written games. It must be something you're running though–except when experimenting with stuff like games and Eurodemos, I probably don't see crashes more than once every couple of weeks.
#31445From: John GagerJan 17, 1993 6:09 PM
Hmmm…..I'll have to look around for that "Arp040Fix". A lot of the programs I still have on the hard drive still use the arp.library. Yep, I've found a few of the PowerPacker crasher's 8^) European games and demo's I don't worry about too much because I expect them to crash 8^) Thanks for the tips Denny, maybe it is just some certain types of programs that are causing problems it's just that I always seem to find the program most likely to crash the machine. Murphy's law at work. . //
#31500From: Wayne ColeJan 19, 1993 2:10 AM
Denny, Would the arp problem be reflected in programs that depend on the arp library even if no arp commands are in one's command path (or loaded on the machine, for that matter)? I have lots of programs that come with and depend on the arp library. But I've necer used the arp system or commands. Would I have trouble on an '040 or A4000? wmc – via Autopilot!
#31513From: Denny Atkin [COMPUTE/AmiJan 19, 1993 6:33 PM
Wayne, Yep, the ARP problem does affect some programs that use ARP library. It depends on which parts they use. For instance, the BlitzDisk disk cache crashes without Arp040Fix. But NameBase, the address program I wrote, works fine even though it uses the ARP file requester.
#31463From: Christopher LapriseJan 18, 1993 12:41 AM
John, Make sure your power supply fan is blowing air out the back. The first time I turned on my A4000 I though, "Hmmm, this machine is _very_ quiet." Some time later I put my hand on the case and the thing was hot! I would have returned the machine but the fan hasn't failed since that first day (Jan 02). -Chris
#31440From: Black Belt SystemsJan 17, 1993 2:14 PM
John, I have never had a crash on the 4000 that I couldn't repeat on the 2500/030, or else explain as a programming error of our own. Never. For whatever that is worth. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#31446From: John GagerJan 17, 1993 6:09 PM
Well I'll try to narrow it down some and see if a certain type of program is causing the crashes. If I can find some kind of repeatability, then maybe I can get rid of the problem or correct it. . //
#31501From: Wayne ColeJan 19, 1993 2:10 AM
CBM is trying to better relations with you so they gave you the custom no-crash A4000 ;^} wmc – via Autopilot!
#31505From: Black Belt SystemsJan 19, 1993 1:30 PM
We bought our 4000's from dealers – not from CBM. We got them faster that way. CBM treats us terribly, probably about like they treat NewTek. I'd guess that's because we don't lick their boots. :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#31547From: SyndesisJan 20, 1993 6:36 PM
Nah, they treat all their developers that way. 🙂
#31451From: Mark SterlingJan 17, 1993 7:51 PM
I have not noticed many crashes with my 4000. It 100% stock so far except for a 2091 SCSI controller which is only occasionally attached to a tape drive for backup. What programs are crashing? I find that Scribble! will not run but it doesn't crash. What? Now stop that laughing! BTW I installed your Macpaint PI loader today. Thanks for writing it. Goin' AP6 …..Mark Sterling6
#31465From: John GagerJan 18, 1993 2:55 AM
Well like I said Mark, it could be just me and the type of programs that I have tried to run. As I find the errant ones, then I purge them to keep them from coming back and haunting me, so I might get things settled down eventually. Scribble….boy you must be a glutton for punishment 8^) And your welcome on the MacPaint loader. I haven't had any feedback on it so if you find any bugs or have any problems, let me know. I'm in the process of writing another PI module for GEM/IMG files. It let's me brush up on my C programming and provides us with some of the other loaders that Ben hasn't had time or desire to write. If you have any want's for a particular loader, let me know and I'll see what I can come up with. . // . \X/ John – K7KB (TechnoJunkie at heart)
#31551From: Mark SterlingJan 20, 1993 8:16 PM
There is always a time of purging outdated software when a new os version or machine comes into your hands. I guess I can do without Scribble!. Po I only have a few macpaint pics but they load just fine. An IMG loader would be nice. Of course you could do a pict loader if you have a spare year.(ducking) Goin' AP6 …..Mark Sterling6
#31559From: John GagerJan 21, 1993 3:30 AM
Do a PICT loader — yeah right <g>. Actually someone else is working on that so I'll leave that up to him. He is a lot more knowledgable about different picture formats than I. Thanks for the comments on the MacPaint loader. // \X/ John – K7KB (TechnoJunkie at heart)
#31466From: Clint Woeltjen@VRLIJan 18, 1993 3:22 AM
Mark: Did you patch Scribble! to run under 2.0? Clint <VRLI>
#31552From: Mark SterlingJan 20, 1993 8:17 PM
Clint, There is a patch? Haha, I thought it was a goner but wait , you did say were using it (no, no that must have been years ago). Where can I find that patch (he said sheepishly). Goin' AP6 …..Mark Sterling6
#31556From: Clint Woeltjen@VRLIJan 21, 1993 12:26 AM
Mark: I saw it in Amazing Computing, shortly after AmigaDOS 2.0 came out. I will try to do a diff between the version I am currently using and the original disk and see if I can come up with what it was. If I can figure it out, I'll email you the results. Clint <VRLI>
#31499From: Wayne ColeJan 19, 1993 2:09 AM
John, Were are the current failure ("Guru") codes listed? wmc – via Autopilot!
#31510From: Vic WagnerJan 19, 1993 4:05 PM
Alerts.h….wherever you keep your include files.
#31535From: John GagerJan 20, 1993 2:20 AM
Wayne, there is not usually a listing of the "Software Failure" codes in most Amiga user's manuals. If you are into programming, you can find all the codes in the Include:exec/alerts.h file. I purchased the "Amiga Programmers Quick Reference" from Vidia and it has all the codes on the front cover, plus a bunch of extra goodies a programmer needs to reference from time to time. . // . \X/ John – K7KB (TechnoJunkie at heart)