CompuServe Thread

#IM R/t & EGS

15 messages in this thread
#83490From: Trent K. JohnsonJun 1, 1994 2:01 AM
Hi Ben. Received my IMR/t update today. Just spent the last couple of hours catalogging all my images. Great Feature! Any plans in the works to offer a render script for the GVP EGS card? Thanks! Trent Johnson
#83598From: Black Belt SystemsJun 2, 1994 1:10 AM
Glad you like the catalog. :^) GVP has declined to provide us with an EGS card on either a permanent or temporary basis. So for the moment (and as long as that situation persists) there are no such plans. Do keep in mind that GVP markets NOVA's "ImageFX" and as such is attempting to compete with Imagemaster R/t – so although we _have_ asked, you might be being a little optomistic if you expect them to come thru… OTOH, such a script may surface from an end user – that's happened a number of times already for several cards. For instance, we've never seen some of the cards that are out there, but they come with drivers for IM R/t. That could happen any number of ways for the EGS (but again, probably not from GVP). –Ben …via AutoPilot
#83691From: Trent K. JohnsonJun 3, 1994 2:36 AM
Thanks for the information Ben. It's too bad that nasty thing called 'competition' still exists! :-> Personally, I have from day one (almost) used ImageMaster, Image FX, and ADPro and find them ALL indispensible. You just can't have too many image processing tools. (Even if you have PhotoShop!) :-> Trent
#83771From: Black Belt SystemsJun 4, 1994 12:49 AM
Actually, if you have Photoshop, you need other image processing tools, as it's a very weak sister in that catagory. Good for prepress, tho. Competition is fine with me, long as it's accurate. Things like Brent Malnacks article in the recent Amigaworld are pretty annoying, but what can you do – there are still a lot of people out there who are hallucinating. :^) . –Ben …via AutoPilot
#83834From: GEIR OTTO MOLSTADJun 5, 1994 8:56 AM
>Actually, if you have Photoshop, you need other image processing tools, >as it's a very weak sister in that catagory. Good for prepress, tho. >Competition is fine with me, long as it's accurate. Things like Brent What is your opinion on photoshops userinterface? Personaly i find i far superior of all the Amiga programs.. Geir Molstad, FAMO as, Fax +47 22357797
#83844From: Black Belt SystemsJun 5, 1994 1:20 PM
What? Photoshop? It's a nice program, but there is very little you can actually _do_ with it, compared to Imagemaster R/t. It's got fewer area selection tools, hundreds fewer operations, and lacks even the most basic special effects. If prepress is your goal (color separations, etc) then Photoshop's a winner. Otherwise, it's only a winner in the marketing sense – many people use it because they just don't know any better. –Ben …via AutoPilot
#83953From: GEIR OTTO MOLSTADJun 6, 1994 11:43 PM
>What? Photoshop? It's a nice program, but there is very little you can >actually _do_ with it, compared to Imagemaster R/t. It's got fewer area My point was that: If i go to a store for red tomatoes, i go to the counter and pick red tomatoes on what i see, not what it sayes on a sign beneath. If i ain't colour blind. A "realtime preview" of the effects would give the user less "undo and try again" waste of time. Geir Molstad, FAMO as, Fax +47 22357797
#84001From: Black Belt SystemsJun 7, 1994 3:45 PM
"My point was that: if i go to a store for red tomatoes, i go to the counter and pick red tomatoes on what i see, not what it says on a sign beneath. If i aint color blind" Ahem. That was, shall we say, less than clear. If you are referring to color accuracy, IM R/t's is as good as the display device you use as far as "what you see" goes. It's 24 bit accurate regardless for operations, of course. If, on the other hand, you were making a reference to perceived power of Photoshop as compared to the perceived power of Imagemaster R/t, it's not just something "on a sign", it's a flat out _fact_ that IM R/t can do a heck of a lot more than Photoshop ever could, in any version, revision or for any platform PhotoShop is made in/for. If you're saying something else completely, I aplogize but I found your message pretty difficult to understand. Perhaps you could restate your position more plainly? –Ben …via AutoPilot
#84094From: GEIR OTTO MOLSTADJun 8, 1994 4:17 PM
Ok heres another "my opinion" thing.. 1 = Bad 10 = Top Photoshop IM rt Userinterface 9 4 Imagehandling 7 5 Number of effects 6 8 Learning curve 8 3 Sorry for my english. Skulle gjerne ha kunnet det mye bedre. Geir Molstad, FAMO as, Fax +47 22357797
#84130From: Black Belt SystemsJun 8, 1994 11:52 PM
Ok, I'll buy that. :^) Here's _my_ opinion: PhotoShop IM R/t Userinterface 5 (childish) 5 (very powerful) Imagehandling 5 (typical) 8 (superior) Number of effects 1 (minimal) 7 (lots! but room for more) Learning curve 7 (none!) 5 (good for what's there) Flexibility 2 (somewhat) 7 (best there is, but improvable) Quality of effects 5 (good) 7 (excellent) Prepress 7 (excellent) 3 (moderate to "ok") Color Reduction 1 (poor) 10 (best in the market anywhere) Morphing 0 (nonexistant) 7 (excellent) Expandability 7 (excellent) 8 (superior) Price 1 (far too high) 10 (price/performance leader) Documentation 5 (ok, limited) 7 (massive details, cutting edge) So there's obviously more than one way to look at this. :^) –Ben …via AutoPilot
#84361From: Charles BlaquiereJun 12, 1994 3:09 PM
Geir, Does Photoshop give you real-time previews of every effect, in any display mode? Pardon my inexperience, but I had the feeling that Photoshop would only preview certain effects, such as Saturation, when in 256-color indexed display mode. The reson is simple: Photoshop only needs to update the 256 colors in the palette, rather than compute the change on the potentially multi-megabyte image being processed. Imagemaster can't do this, because it can't rely on there being a 256-color indexed display active at the moment. Imagemaster owners run the program on true 24-bit displays, AGA HAM-8 displays and the lust goes on. From what I've been led to believe, Photoshop offers previews in certain situations when it's computationally trivial to do so. Is this true? If not, please enlighten me, as I'm a big Photoshop fan, but have no access to the program at home or at work. By the way, to preview an effect in Imagemaster, just clip out a representative sample of your main image, and try out the effect on _that_. Effects will be computed quickly, you can press <u> to undo the change and <a> to bring up the effect's control panel again, where you can alter the parameters and try again. True, it's not a real-time preview, but it allows relatively painless experimentation. Blaq!
#84521From: GEIR OTTO MOLSTADJun 15, 1994 5:08 PM
>Does Photoshop give you real-time previews of every effect, in any >display mode? Pardon my inexperience, but I had the feeling that No, but the most important ones (imho) Geir Molstad, FAMO as, Fax +47 22357797
#83945From: Charles BlaquiereJun 6, 1994 10:38 PM
Geir, From what I've seen and read about Photoshop, it's less powerful than Imagemaster, but much more streamlined — typical, everyday functions are easily accessed using the mouse and maybe a modifier key, whereas Imagemaster seems to require 4 steps to do amything. Of course, Photoshop is also 5 times the price. <g> Blaq!
#83885From: Trent K. JohnsonJun 6, 1994 12:32 AM
Yeah, I agree. BTW, I've been writing up a response to send to GVP over this EGS situation. After all, ADPro supports EGS cards, and it bugs me when developers are stingy for the wrong reasons. In any case, There's been no decrease in use of IM R/t around my shop. Even though we had such an old version of IM, I found the transition to the latest R/t a snap. Kudos to you and your people! Trent/ReAnimators
#84000From: Black Belt SystemsJun 7, 1994 3:44 PM
Thank you! –Ben …via AutoPilot